Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Heritage Towers Pvt Ltd & Ors. vs .............
2014 Latest Caselaw 5153 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 5153 Del
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2014

Delhi High Court
Heritage Towers Pvt Ltd & Ors. vs ............. on 14 October, 2014
$~37
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+    Co. Appl. (M) No. 142/2014
IN THE MATTER OF
HERITAGE TOWERS PVT LTD & ORS.   ....Applicants

                          Through:       Mr. Dilip Singh, Advocate
                                        for      the      Applicant
                                        Companies.

     CORAM:
     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                ORDER

% 14.10.2014

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)

1. This is a first motion joint Application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("Act") in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation ("Scheme") of Heritage Towers Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Transferor Company No.

1), Nipun Buildwell Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Transferor Company No. 2) and Samarth Buildwell Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Transferor Company No. 3) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Transferor Companies) with Pashupati Towers Private Limited

================================================

(hereinafter referred to as the Transferee Company) (hereinafter all Companies collectively referred to as Applicant Companies). A copy of the proposed Scheme has been enclosed along with the Application.

2. The registered offices of the Applicant Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The details with regard to the date of incorporation of Applicant Companies, their Authorized, Issued, Subscribed and Paid up Capital have been set out in the present Application.

4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31 st March, 2013 of the Applicant Companies have also been enclosed with the present Application.

5. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submits that no proceeding under sections 235 to 251 of the Act is pending against any of the Applicant Companies as on the date of the present Application.

================================================

6. The proposed Scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of all the Applicant Companies. Copies of the Board Resolutions have been filed along with the present Application.

7. The status of the Shareholders, Secured and Un-secured Creditors of the Transferor Company and Transferee Company is apparent from the chart given below:-

Company      No. of    Consent   No. of      Consent   No. of      Consent
             Share     Given     Secured     Given     Unsecured   Given
             holders             Creditors             Creditors
Transferor      2        All        NIL          N.A        3        All
Company
No 1
Transferor      2        All        NIL          N.A      NIL        N.A
Company
No 2
Transferor      2        All        NIL          N.A      NIL        N.A
Company
No 3
Transferee      2        All        NIL          N.A       2         All
Company



8. In view of the above, a prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders, Secured Creditors and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Companies.

================================================

9. In view of the written consents/NOC obtained by the Shareholders of the Applicant Companies, the requirements of convening meetings of the Shareholders of the Applicant Companies are dispensed with.

10. In view of the written consents/NOC obtained by the all Un-secured Creditors of the Transferor Company No. 1 and Transferee Company, the requirements of convening meetings of Un-secured Creditors of the Transferor Company No. 1 and Transferee Company are dispensed with.

11. Since there are no Un-Secured Creditors in Transferor Company No. 2 and Transferor Company No. 3, therefore the requirement of convening meeting of Un- Secured Creditors of Transferor Company No. 2 and Transferor Company No. 3 does not arise.

12. Since there are no Secured Creditors in Applicant Companies, therefore the requirement of convening meeting of Secured Creditors of Applicant Companies the does not arise.

================================================

13. The Application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Order Dasti.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J OCTOBER 14, 2014 sv

================================================

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter