Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 1860 Del
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2014
$~-4
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P. (C) No. 9257/2004
VED PRAKASH TALWAR ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
CANARA BANK & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Pradeep Diwan, Sr. Advocate
with Mr. Rahul Jain, Advocate for R-
1 along with Mr. S.S. Mehra,
Manager, Canara Bank
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal & Mr. Gaurav
Khanna, Advocates for R-2 and R-3
along with Ms. Anupama Bhatnagar,
Director, News Service Division,
AIR, Akashwani, New Delhi
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR
ORDER
% 04.04.2014 Rev. Pet. No.284/2009
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate, is present on behalf of non-
applicants/respondent Nos.2 and 3. Ms. Anupama Bhatnagar, Director,
News Service Division, AIR, Akashwani, New Delhi is present in court in
compliance with the order dated 04.03.2014.
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal submits that the cost of Rs.15,000/- has been paid
by him in court through cheque in favour of the counsel for the applicant. Counsel also submitted that he had already filed reply on 02.04.2014.
Heard.
Vide order dated 10.01.2014, this court directed the personal presence
of Director General, News Service Division, AIR, Akashwani, New Delhi
for the next date. However, the Director General, News Service Division,
AIR, Akashwani, New Delhi failed to appear on the said date due to which,
this court directed the personal presence of Mr. Rajiv Mehra, learned
Additional Solicitor General of India on the same date. Mr. Rajiv Mehra,
ASG appeared in court and gave assurance that he would personally look
into the conduct of the Director General, News Service Division, AIR,
Akashwani, New Delhi, and shall ensure his presence before the court on the
next date. Mr. Rajiv Mehra, ASG also submitted that he would personally
look into the controversy involved in the present matter so as to assist the
court.
In the light of the above, let an affidavit be filed by the Director
General, News Service Division, AIR, Akashwani, New Delhi for failure to
appear in the court despite directions given by this court vide orders dated
10.01.2014 and 21.02.2014. Affidavit shall be filed within a period of three
weeks.
The court is also appalled to find that no prompt steps were taken by
the said department to file reply to the review petition as the same is still not
on record.
Let the counsel take steps to place the said reply on record before the
next date of hearing. Rejoinder, if any, be filed by the applicant within a
period of four weeks.
List this matter for final disposal on 23rd May, 2014.
KAILASH GAMBHIR, J APRIL 04, 2014 v
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!