Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 6513 Del
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Judgment:07.11.2012
+ COMPANY PETITION NO. 334 OF 2012
BHASKAR REFRACTORIES AND SW
PIPES PRIVATE LIMITED .......... Demerged Company
AND
B N B S CEMENTS AND PRODUCTS
PRIVATE LIMITED ...................Resultant Company
Through Mr. Mukesh Sukhija, Advocate
for the Petitioners
Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy Registrar of
Companies for the Regional Director
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the Official
Liquidator
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)
1 This joint Petition has been filed under sections 391(2) & 394 of
the Companies Act, 1956 by the Petitioner Demerged Company and
Resultant Company seeking sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement of
Demerger of Estate Division of BHASKAR REFRACTORIES AND
SW PIPES PRIVATE LIMITED (Demerged Company); into B N B S
CEMENTS AND PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED (Resultant
Company).
2 The registered offices of the Petitioner Demerged Company and
Resultant Company are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of
this Court.
3 Details with regard to the date of incorporation of Demerged
Company and Resultant Company, their authorized, issued, subscribed
and paid up capital have been given in the Petition.
4 Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as
the latest audited Accounts as at 31st March, 2011 of the Petitioner
Demerged Company and Resultant Company have also been enclosed
with the Petition.
5 Copies of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of the
Petitioner Companies approving the Scheme of Arrangement have also
been placed on record.
6 It has been submitted that no proceedings under Sections 235 to
251 of the Companies Act, 1956 is pending against the Petitioner
Companies.
7 So far as Share Exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that upon amalgamation of the 'Demerged Companyinto the
'Resultant Company' pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement, the
following would be the share Exchange Ratio:
"790 (Seven Hundred Ninety) Equity shares of the face value of Rs. 100/- for every 100 (One Hundred) equity shares of Rs. 100 each held, for the proportionate capital employed in the Estate Division of the Demerged Company."
8 The Petitioner Companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 110
seeking directions of this Court for dispensation/convening of meetings.
Vide order dated July 4, 2012, this Court allowed the Application and
dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders,
Secured Creditors and Un-secured Creditors of the Demerged Company
and the Resultant Company.
9 The Petitioner Demerged Company and the Resultant Company
have thereafter filed the present Petition seeking sanction of the Scheme
of Arrangement. Vide order dated July 20, 2012, notice in the Petition
was directed to be issued to the Regional Director, Northern Region.
Citations were also directed to be published in the 'Business Standard
(English, Delhi Edition) and 'Business Standard' (Hindi, Delhi Edition).
Affidavit of Service and Publication has been filed by the Petitioners
showing compliance regarding service of the Petition on the Regional
Director, Northern Region and also regarding publication of citations in
the aforesaid newspaper on October 26, 2012. Copies of the newspaper
cuttings, in original, containing the publications have been filed along
with the Affidavit of Service.
10 In response to the notices issued in the Petition, Mr. Rakesh
Chandra, Learned Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of
Corporate Affairs has filed his Affidavit dated 1st November, 2012.
Relying on Clause 8 (a) of the Scheme of Arrangement, he has stated
that, upon sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement, all the employees of
the Demerged Company shall become the employees of the Resultant
Company without any break or interruption in their services upon
sanctioning of the Scheme of Arrangement by the Hon'ble Court. He
has vide para 4 of his affidavit submitted as follows:
"4. That the deponent further craves leave to submit that the individual assets and liabilities an the values thereof pertaining to "Estate Undertaking" of the Demerged Company Viz. M/s Bhaskar Refractories & SW Pipes Pvt Ltd. proposed to ebe transferred to the Resulting Company Viz. M/ B N B S Cements
Products Pvt Ltd. are not mentioned in the Scheme. Since Shareholders and Creditors of the Companies have approved the Scheme of Arrangement as such, it should have been part of the Scheme of Arrangement so that the details of the individual assets and liabilities and the values thereof pertaining to De-merged Undertaking are known to the Shareholders & Creditors of both the Transferor & Transferee Company."
11 In response to the observations of the Ld. RD the Petitioner
Companies have filed an affidavit vide stating as follows:
3. That with regard to the above observations, the deponent submits as follows:
(i) That the present Scheme of Arrangement involves the Holding Company and the Subsidiary Company i.e. the Estate Division of the M/s Bhaskar Refractories and SW Pipes Private Limited- Demerged Company (being the holding company of Resultant Company) is demerging into M/s B N B S Cements And Products Private Limited- the Resultant Company (being wholly owned subsidiary of the De-merged Company). Also both the Companies are controlled by the members of the same family.
(ii) The copy of the Scheme of Arrangement was provided to all the shareholders and the creditors of the De-merged Company and the Resultant Company and was approved by them.
(iii) That the Scheme of Arrangement is to take effect from 1st day of April 2011 and complete balance sheet of the Demerged Company as at 31st March 2011 was approved by the
shareholders of Demerged Company and filed along with the First Motion Application filed with this Hon'ble Court.
(i) That the Ld. Regional Director vide their letter bearing no. 6/145/T-
1/2011/3179 dated 8th August 2012 directed the petitioner Companies to submit the details of the Estate Division and the Petitioner Companies vide their reply dated 8th October 2012 duly submitted the details as directed by the Ld. RD. The copy of the letter issued by Ld.
RD and the reply submitted by the Petitioner Companies are enclosed herewith and marked as Annexure: A (Colly)
(ii) However the balance sheet of the Estate Division of the Demerged Entity as at 31st March 2011 is enclosed herewith for ready reference and marked as Annexure: B
12 In view of the submissions made hereinabove the observations made by the Ld. RD do not survive.
13 No objection has been received to the Scheme of
Arrangement from any other party. The respective directors for the
Petitioner Companies, has filed an affidavit dated 3rd November,
2012, confirming that neither the Petitioner Companies nor the
counsel for the petitioner Companies has received any objection
pursuant to citations published in the newspapers.
14 In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and
Creditors of the Petitioner Companies; representation/reports filed by
the Regional Director, Northern Region to the proposed Scheme of
Arrangement, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of
sanction to the Scheme of Arrangement. Consequently, sanction is
hereby granted to the Scheme of Arrangement under sections 391
and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioner Companies will
comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with law.
Certified copy of the order be filed with the Registrar of Companies
within 30 days from the date of receipt of the same. In terms of the
provisions of sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, and
in terms of the Scheme, the whole of the assets, rights and powers of
the Estate Division of Demerged Company be transferred to and vest
in the Resultant Company without any further act or deed. Similarly,
in terms of the Scheme, all the liabilities and duties of the Estate
Division of Demerged Company be transferred to the Resultant
Company without any further act or deed. It is, however, clarified
that this order will not be construed as an order granting exemption
from payment of stamp duty or taxes or any other charges, if payable
in accordance with any law; or permission/compliance with any other
requirement which may be specifically required under any law.
15 Learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the
Petitioner Companies would voluntarily deposit a sum of Rs. One lac
in the Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator within three
weeks from today. The statement is accepted.
16 The Petition is allowed in the above terms.
Order Dasti.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
NOVEMBER 07, 2012
A
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!