Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kuldeep Singh vs Kishore Singh & Ors.
2012 Latest Caselaw 4826 Del

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 4826 Del
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2012

Delhi High Court
Kuldeep Singh vs Kishore Singh & Ors. on 17 August, 2012
Author: G.P. Mittal
*        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                 Date of decision: 17th August, 2012
+        MAC. APP. 482/2004

         KULDEEP SINGH                                     ...... Appellant
                      Through:           Mr. N.S. Dalal, Adv.

                                        versus

         KISHORE SINGH & ORS.                       ..... Respondents
                      Through:           Mr. Ram N. Sharma, Adv. for R-3.

         CORAM:
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL

                                  JUDGMENT

G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of `68,600/- awarded in favour of the Appellant Kuldeep Singh who suffered grievous injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 02.08.1997.

2. In the absence of any Appeal by the driver, owner or the Insurer, the finding on negligence has attained finality between the parties.

3. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that the Appellant remained admitted in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital and Pushpanjali Hospital, Gurgaon. He suffered multiple fractures including the head injury. The compensation of `68,600/- awarded by the Claims Tribunal is very meager.

4. The compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal is tabulated hereunder:-

Sl. Compensation under various heads Awarded by the Claims Tribunal No.

          1.         Medical Expenses                                        `5,000/-

          2.         Pain & Suffering                                       ` 35,000/-

          3.         Loss of Enjoyment of Amenities of Life                ` 20,000/-

          4.         Loss of Income                                         ` 3,600/-

          5.         Conveyance, Special Diet                               ` 5,000/-

                                                          Total            ` 68,600/-

5. The Claims Tribunal dealt with the injuries suffered and the treatment received by him (the Appellant) in Para 61 of the impugned judgment, which is extracted hereunder:-

"61. PW Kuldeep Singh stated that he sustained head injuries, fracture on his right leg below the knee; fracture on small finger of the right hand; two teeth were broken and also chest bone fracture in the accident. He stated that he was treated by doctors of Civil Hospital, Rishikesh (U.P.), and then in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, and also in Divakar Nursing Home, Gurgaon, and Pushpanjali Hospital, Gurgaon. He stated that he spent about Rs. 75,000/- on his medical treatment. As per X-ray report dated 04-08-97 Ex. PW1/4 of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, petitioner suffered fracture of the shaft of 5th meta carpal with lateral displacement of distal fragment. As per X-ray report of Pushpanjali Hospital dated 05- 08-97 Ex. PW1/5, petitioner sustained loss of cervical lordosis due to muscle spasm and mild central compression of D7. As per CAT scan report dated 03-08-97 Ex. PW1/6, fracture of left zygomatic arch was noted. As per bill Ex. PW1/11, petitioner remained admitted in Pushpanjali Hospital, Gurgaon, from 05-08-97 to 07- 08-97 incurring total medical expenses of Rs.1,330/-."

6. Immediately, after the accident the Appellant was admitted in Civil Hospital, Rishikesh. After receiving first aid, he came to his place of residence in Bijwasan. There is no documentary evidence on record that

he remained as an indoor patient in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital. A perusal of the record shows that only X-ray was got done in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital. The Appellant remained admitted in Pushpanjali Hospital from 05.08.1997 to 07.08.1997. He had to undergo CAT scan in New Delhi Scan Research Institute, Sir Ganga Ram Hospial. The Appellant was able to produce the bills for various investigation and indoor treatment in Pushpanjali Hospital only for a sum of `4880/-. The Claims Tribunal made an award of `5,000/- towards expenditure on medical treatment. I have already extracted above para 61 of the impugned judgment which reveals that the Appellant suffered fracture of the shaft of 5th metacarpal with lateral displacement of distal fragment, fracture of right little finger, fracture of ribs & fracture of left zygomatic arch. His two teeth were also broken. He also suffered head injury.

7. The Appellant must have remained under treatment for at least four-six months. The compensation of ` 5,000/- awarded towards the medical treatment was wholly inadequate. The same is enhanced to `10,000/-.

8. Considering the nature of injuries suffered, the Appellant must have not been able to attend to his work for a period of about four months. The loss of income awarded for two months i.e. `3600/- is enhanced to `7200/-.

9. Considering the nature of injuries, the compensation towards pain and suffering is enhanced to `40,000/- and towards conveyance and special diet to `10,000/-

10. The enhanced compensation is re-computed hereunder:-

Sl. Compensation under various heads Awarded by this Court No.

          1.         Medical Expenses                                       `10,000/-

          2.         Pain & Suffering                                      ` 40,000/-

          3.         Loss of Enjoyment of Amenities of Life                ` 20,000/-

          4.         Loss of Income                                          `7200/-

          5.         Conveyance, Special Diet                              ` 10,000/-

                                                         Total             ` 87,200/-

11. The compensation is thus enhanced from `68,600/- to `87,200/-.

12. The enhanced compensation of ` 18,600/- shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till its payment.

13. Respondent No.3 the Oriental Insurance Company Limited is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation along with interest in the name of the Appellant with the Claims Tribunal within six weeks and shall be released in favour of the Appellant.

14. The Appeal is allowed in above terms.

15. Pending Applications also stand disposed of.

(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE AUGUST 17, 2012 vk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter