Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 3946 Del
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ Writ Petition (Civil) No. 5850/2011
% Date of Decision: August 12, 2011
Shri Bal Kishan & Ors. ....Petitioner
Through Ms. Maninder Acharya with
Mr. Yashish Chandra, Advocates.
VERSUS
Union of India & Ors. .....Respondents
Through Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and
Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
ORDER
The present writ petition filed by 16 petitioners impugns the
order dated 12th May, 2010, passed by the Central Administrative
Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal, for short)
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
the petitioners were granted temporary status and even if they are
not entitled to regularization, the respondent could have
continued with their employment after preparing an all India
seniority list. It is submitted that the principle of last to come first
to go, has not been adhered to by the respondent.
3. The petitioners have rightly not pressed their regularization
in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Secretary,
State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi (3), 2006(4) SCC 1. It
may be noticed that the Tribunal has also recorded that the
Original Applications were filed in 2008 whereas the services of
the petitioners were terminated vide order dated 31st January,
2004. Thus, the plea of limitation was raised, but the respondent
did not seriously press the same.
4. The main contention raised by the petitioners is that the
principle of 'last to come first to go' was not followed. The said
contention has been rightly rejected by the Tribunal on the ground
that the petitioners were appointed for specific work at NSG at
Manesar. After the work was over, the site was handed over to
NSG, Manesar on 31st January, 2004. CPWD carries out
operations all over India and, therefore, it is not possible for them
to have all India seniority list and accordingly apply the principle
of 'last to come first to go' on all India basis.
5. In view of the aforesaid, we do not find any merit in the
present writ petition and the same is dismissed in limine.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHIEF JUSTICE August 12, 2011 kkb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!