Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Superior Steel Products (Pvt) ... vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi
1992 Latest Caselaw 268 Del

Citation : 1992 Latest Caselaw 268 Del
Judgement Date : 16 April, 1992

Delhi High Court
Superior Steel Products (Pvt) ... vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 16 April, 1992
Equivalent citations: 1992 (23) DRJ 287
Author: M Shamim
Bench: M Shamim

JUDGMENT

Mohd. Shamim, J.

(1) This is a petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act. The petitioner herein through the present petition want that the disputes referred in para 19 of the present petition be referred to an arbitrator appointed by this Court.

(2) Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.Bhasin has contended that similar disputes which are very much akin to the disputes herein have already been referred to the sole arbitration of Mr. Justice S.S. Chadha, a retired Judge of this Court, who was appointed as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties. According to him similar disputes raised in Civil writ petition No. 2328/89, M/s. sunil Rai & Co.Pvt.Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, and in suit No.814/91, M/s Goenka Alloy Steel (P) Ltd. V. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, have already been referred to the sole arbitration of Mr.Justice S.S. Chadha and the proceedings are still pending before him. He thus wants that the disputes involved in the present suit be also referred to the sole arbitration of Mr. Justice S.S. Chadha, a retired Judge of this Court.

(3) Mr. Ashok Bhasin, learned counsel for the M.C.D. has concede with commendable fairness on his part that the disputes in the present proceedings are very much akin to the disputes already referred to the sole arbitration of Mr. Justice S.S. Chadha which are pending decision before him. He has this got no objection in case the present disputes are also referred to the sole arbitration of Mr. Justice S.S. Chadha.

(4) In the circumstances stated above, the present petition is allowed. Let the arbitration agreement be filed. I appoint Mr.Justice S.S. Chadha, a retired Judge of this Court, as the sole arbitrator to decide and adjudicate upon the disputes raised through para 19 of the present petition. Mr. Justice S.S. Chadha will free to fix his own fees to be paid by the petitioner. He would decide the disputes involved in the present petition preferably along with the other matters which are pending decision before him.

(5) The respondent shall not disconnect the electricity of the petitioner on account of the nonpayment of the bill in dispute till the awards given by the arbitrator. A copy of this order be given and sent to Mr. Justice S.S. Chadha i.e. the sole arbitrator.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter