Sunday, 12, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satyam Chandrakar vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 878 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 878 Chatt
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Satyam Chandrakar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 23 March, 2026

Author: Ramesh Sinha
Bench: Ramesh Sinha
                                                 1




                                                                2026:CGHC:13802
                                                                              NAFR

                         HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                     MCRC No. 2701 of 2026

             Satyam Chandrakar S/o Dilip Chandrakar Aged About 28 Years R/o-
             Sunder Nagar, Raipur District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
                                                                          ... Applicant
                                              versus
             State of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station- Kabir Nagar, District-
             Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
                                                                     ... Non-applicant
             For Applicant                  : Mr. Virendra Kashyap, Advocate
             For Non-applicant/State        : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer
                             Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
                                         Order on Board

            23.03.2026

             1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the

Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to

the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.

261/2025 registered at Police Station Kabir Nagar, District- Raipur

(C.G.) for the offence under Sections 21(b), 27(a) and 29 of the

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 27.12.2025, acting on the

basis of secret information, the police conducted a raid at House

RAHUL No. 01, LIG Phase-I, belonging to co-accused Harpreet Kaur, from DEWANGAN

Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN

where 16.1 grams of heroin (chitta) was allegedly recovered from a

drawer of a bed, during the course of investigation, co-accused

Harpreet Kaur, in her memorandum statement, allegedly disclosed

that the said contraband had been brought by her husband, co-

accused Jodha Singh, from Punjab, and thereafter co-accused

Jodha Singh, in his memorandum statement, allegedly stated that

he had procured the contraband from co-accused Sukhraj Singh of

Bhilai and had sold the same along with the present applicant,

Satyam Chandrakar, it is further alleged that 7.12 grams of chitta

was seized from co-accused Sukhraj Singh and that the present

applicant had allegedly consumed narcotic substances, and on the

basis of the aforesaid allegations, the present bail application has

been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant

is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He

further submits that the said contraband article was not seized from

the possession of the present applicant. He also submits that

prosecution agency has not followed the provisions under Section

42 of the NDPS Act. He further submits that co-accused persons,

namely, Harpreet Kaur and Jodha Singh have already been granted

bail by this Court vide order dated 19.03.2026 in MCRC No.

2583/2026. He also submits that the applicant has no criminal

antecedents and he is in jail since 18.02.2026 and conclusion of the

trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for grant of

regular bail to the applicant on the ground of parity.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail

application of the applicant and submits that the charge-sheet has

been filed before the competent Court, but could not dispute the fact

that co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this

Court.

5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused

the case diary.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case

that in the present bail application the charge-sheet has been filed

before the competent Court, the said contraband article was not

recovered form the exclusive possession of the applicant the

contraband article i.e. 16.01 grams of heroin (chitta) recovered from

the drawer of a bed in possession of the co-accused, Harpreet

Kaur, is less than the commercial quantity, and further the co-

accused persons, namely, Harpreet Kaur and Jodha Singh have

already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 19.03.2026

in MCRC No. 2583/2026, and the applicant has no criminal

antecedents and he is in jail since 18.02.2026 and conclusion of the

trial may take some time, therefore, this Court is of the view that the

applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

7. Accordingly, the bail application of the applicant is allowed. Let the

Applicant - Satyam Chandrakar, involved in Crime No. 261/2025

registered at Police Station Kabir Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) for

the offence under Sections 21(b), 27(a) and 29 of the Narcotic

Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, be released on bail

on furnishing personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to

the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following

conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect

that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates

fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in

court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be

open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of

bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial

court on each date fixed, either personally or through

his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient

cause, the trial court may proceed against him under

Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail

during trial and in order to secure his presence,

proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued

and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on

the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial

court shall initiate proceedings against him, in

accordance with law, under Section 209 of the

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person,

before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening

of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of

statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the

opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is

deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be

open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse

of liberty of bail and proceed against him in

accordance with law.

8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial

Court concerned for necessary information and compliance

forthwith.

Sd/-

(Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice

Rahul Dewangan

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter