Sunday, 12, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Avadhesh Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 776 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 776 Chatt
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Avadhesh Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 19 March, 2026

Author: Ramesh Sinha
Bench: Ramesh Sinha
                                                      1




                                                                     2026:CGHC:13255


                                                                                     NAFR

                         HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR


GOURI                                     MCRC No. 1966 of 2026
MUDALIAR
              Avadhesh Singh S/o Shri Ambika Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o- Village
Digitally signed by
GOURI               Pirdhu, Salaiya, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) Present Address-       Village
MUDALIAR
Date: 2026.03.19 Karanja, Liquor Shop Karanja, Tahsil Lanji, District- Balaghat (M.P.)
18:03:37 +0530
                                                                              ...Applicant


                                                   versus


              State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station-
              Dongargarh District- Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)
                                                                          ... Respondent

For Applicant : Shri Saurabh Gupta, Advocate.

              For                   :   Shri Sourabh Sahu, PL.
              Respondent/State


                                        Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
                                             Order on Board
              19/03/2026

1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') for grant of regular

bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime

No.606/2025 registered at Police Station Dongargarh, District-

Rajnandgaon (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2),

59(A) of C.G. Excise Act and sections 339, 366(3), 340(2) of BNS,

2023.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 17.12.2025, the Police of

Police Station Dongargarh received secret information from an

informant that a huge quantity of illegally M.P. Manufactured liquor was

stored and being sold from the house of Birbal Verma, situated Near

Shitla Temple at Village Musrakhurd, by filling liquor in Madhya

Pradesh bottles and affixing false labels of C.G. Aavkari's Jammu

Special Whisky. Acting upon the said information, the police party went

to the spot and conducted a raid at the house of co-accused Birbal

Verma, where two persons were found present. On enquiry, one

disclosed his name as Birbal Verma, while the other disclosed his

name as Chandrakant @ Sonu during search total quantity of 62.64

bulk litres of illegal liquor was seized from the said house and the co-

accused persons have named one Rajpal Bhatiya therefore the police

arrested said Rajpal recorded his memorandum in the said

memorandum he named the applicant saying that the liquor was

purchased from the Karanja shop, P.S. Lanjhi, Distt.-Balaghat where

the applicant is working as Manager. Thereafter, the present applicant

was arrested on the basis of suspicion.

3. Learned counsel submits that the applicant is innocent and has been

falsely implicated in the present case. It is argued that the applicant's

name does not appear in the FIR dated 17.12.2025, and his implication

is solely based on the memorandum statement of a co-accused. It is

further submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession

of the applicant, and the entire alleged contraband was seized from co-

accused persons. The applicant is merely an employee of a licensed

liquor shop in Karanja, Madhya Pradesh, and has no connection with

any alleged illegal activity. He also submits that applicant is in jail since

06/01/2026 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long

time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant would oppose the bail

application. He would submit that the applicant happens to be the

Manager of the liquor shop from where the co-accused persons have

purchased the liquor i.e. 62.64 bulk litres. He would submit that the

applicant has no criminal antecedents.

5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the

case diary.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case,

considering the fact that the applicant happens to be the Manager of

the liqour shop from where the co-accused persons have purchased

the liqour, applicant is in jail since 06/01/2026, he has no criminal

antecedents and further the conclusion of the trial may take some more

time, therefore this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to

be released on bail in this case.

7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that the

applicant - Avadhesh Singh, involved in Crime No.606/2025

registered at Police Station Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2), 59(A) of C.G. Excise

Act and sections 339, 366(3), 340(2) of BNS, 2023, be released on bail

on his furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties in the like

sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following

conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect

that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates

fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in

court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be

open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of

bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial

court on each date fixed, either personally or through

his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient

cause, the trial court may proceed against him under

Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail

during trial and in order to secure his presence,

proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and

the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date

fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall

initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law,

under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person,

before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of

the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of

statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion

of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or

without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial

court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and

proceed against him in accordance with law.

8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court

for necessary information and compliance forthwith.

              -                                               Sd/-
                                                        (Ramesh Sinha)
                                                         Chief Justice




gouri
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter