Friday, 10, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Amit Mishra @ Pahlu vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 671 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 671 Chatt
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2026

[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Amit Mishra @ Pahlu vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 18 March, 2026

Author: Ramesh Sinha
Bench: Ramesh Sinha
                                                         1




         Digitally
                                                                           2026:CGHC:12998
         signed by

                                                                                           NAFR
         VAISHALI
VAISHALI LUCKY
LUCKY    NAGARIA
NAGARIA Date:
         2026.03.19
         17:47:57
         +0530




                               HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR


                                            MCRC No. 1092 of 2026

                      •   Amit Mishra @ Pahlu S/o Nityanand Mishra Aged About 30 Years
                          Profession Business, Caste Brahmin R/o Mohallah Sattipara, P.S.
                          And Tehsil Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.)
                                                                              --- Applicant(s)
                                                      versus
                      •   State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station
                          Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.)
                                                                             --- Respondent(s)

• Amit Mishra @ Pahlu S/o Nityanand Mishra Aged About 30 Years R/o Sattipara, P.S. Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

---Applicant(s) Versus • State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Gandhinagar, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondent(s)

• Amit Mishra @ Pahlu S/o Nityanand Mishra Aged About 30 Years R/o Sattipara Near Shiv Mandir, P.S. Kotwali, Ambikapur, District :

Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

---Applicant(s) Versus • State of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

--- Respondent(s)

• Amit Mishra@Pahlu S/o Nityanand Mishra Aged About 30 Years Occupation Business, Caste Brahmin, R/o Mohollah Sattipara, P.S. And Tehsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

---Applicant(s) Versus • State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Gandhinagar, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System)

For Applicant(s) : Mr. Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Soumya Rai, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

Order on Board 18/03/2026

1. Since the above-mentioned four bail applications belongs to one

applicant arising out of different crime numbers registered at

different police stations, they are clubbed and heard together and are

being disposed of by this common order.

2. In MCRC No.1092 of 2026 -This is first bail application filed under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for

short 'BNSS') for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been

arrested in crime No. 472 of 2025 registered at Police Station

Ambikapur, District - Sarguja for the offence punishable under

Sections 318(4), 319(2), 111(2) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhiya for short -

BNS, 2023 and Section 66(c) of I.T. Act.

3. In MCRC No.1049 of 2026 -This is first bail application filed under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for

short 'BNSS') for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been

arrested in crime No.493 of 2025 registered at Police Station

Ambikapur, District - Sarguja for the offence punishable under

Sections 61(2), 238, 111(2) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhiya for short -

BNS, 2023 and Section 419, 420 of IPC.

4. In MCRC No.1208 of 2026 -This is first bail application filed under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for

short 'BNSS') for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been

arrested in crime No.571 of 2025 registered at Police Station

Gandhinagar, District - Sarguja for the offence punishable under

Sections 318(4), 317, 111 and 61(2) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhiya.

5. In MCRC No.1063 of 2026 -This is first bail application filed under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for

short 'BNSS') for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been

arrested in crime No.397 of 2025 registered at Police Station

Gandhinagar, District - Sarguja for the offence punishable under

Sections 317(4), 318, 238, 61(2) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhiya.

6. As per the leading case, prosecution story, in brief, is that during the

investigation, on tracing the applicant, it was found that the

applicant was in Raipur. After the cyber team detained him from

Raipur and interrogated him, it was found that the applicant had

obtained bank accounts of account holders Gagan Agrawal, Sahil

Mansuri, Rahul Sonkar and others by deceiving them in different

ways and using them on platforms like betting and receiving betting

money online. Hence, this offence.

7. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant

has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in

offence in question and the allegations levelled against him are

vogue, concocted, and based on fabricated statements recorded by

the Ambikapur Police Station with an intent wrongly implicate the

applicant. He also submits that the applicant has not withdrawn

any amount which is seized by the police as alleged against the

applicant. It is further stated that applicant has neither

committed alleged offence nor any kind have been involved in

this case. It is further contended that in Crime Nos.472 of

2025, 493 of 2025, 571 of 2025 and Crime No.397 of 2025

applicant is in jail since 24.07.2025, 09.10.2025 and

25.07.2025 respectively. He would submit that the applicant

has not withdrawn any amount which is seized by the police as

alleged against the applicant. It is further stated that applicant

has neither committed alleged offence nor any kind have been

involved in this case. He also submits that conclusion of trial

will take some time, therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the

applicant.

8. On the other hand, learned State Counsel opposes the bail

application and submit that charge sheet has been filed in

these cases before the competent court. He also submits that in

compliance of this Court's order dated 02.02.2026 and

28.02.2026, concerned investigating Officer has filed his

personal affidavit in three cases except MCRC No.1208 of 2026

and perusal of the affidavit filed by the Investigating Officer in

MCRC No.1092 of 2026, and relevant paragraph of affidavit

reads as under:-

"7.That, as per the FIR it is alleged that one Gagan Agrawal was taken into custody who disclosed in his statement that he was cheated by the Amit Mishra @ Pahlu for work of Munshi, who has taken his SIM Card, ATM card, Passbook and Cheque Book but

neither he was deployed as clerk nor his aforesaid documents were returned back to him.

8.That, during the course of investigation the police found that the applicant Amit Mishra @ Pahlu has used the document of Gagan Agrawal and used his account and therefore, the offences was registered.

9.That, it was also found by the police that as per the letter received from Cyber Cell the account of Gagan Agrawal was used many times and against such accounts various online complaints have also been registered in various states of the country, which is evident from acknowledgment No.21312240054966, 22912240100112, 31512240028283, 3161224010424 and 31612240106385,

10.That, it was found by the police that the bank account number of overseas bank branch Bilaspur bearing Account No.299302000000299 was used for online cyber fraud and against this account five online cyber fraud complaint are registered, in various part of the country.

11.That, the suspected Gagan Agrawal was taken into custody and his statement under Section 180 of BNSS was recorded in which he categorically stated that his account and mobile phone were used by the present applicant Amit Mishra @ Pahlu and all the transactions were conducted /committed by the present applicant and not by him, and he has not knowledge about the transactions from this bank account."

9. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and

perused the case diary.

10. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the

case, submission of learned counsel for the parties, further

considering the affidavit filed by the Investigating Officer, which

shows that present applicant taken the SIM Card, ATM card,

Passbook and Cheque Book of the complainants and used the

same for cyber fraud but there was no amount transaction was

found in the bank account of the applicant, he is in jail since

24.07.2025, charge sheet has been filed and also considering

the fact that trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion,

therefore, considering the period of detention of the applicant,

this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be

released on bail in this case.

11. Accordingly, the bail applications are allowed and it is directed

that the Applicant- Amit Mishra @ Pahlu, involved in

472/2025, 493/2025, 571/2025 and 397/2025 registered at

concerned Police Stations for the aforesaid offences, be released

on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in

the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the

following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

12. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the

trial Court for necessary information and compliance.

Sd/-

(Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter