Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ishwar Chouhan vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1692 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1692 Chatt
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Ishwar Chouhan vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 15 April, 2026

Author: Ramesh Sinha
Bench: Ramesh Sinha
                                                           1




                                                                            2026:CGHC:17245
                                                                                               NAFR

                                 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                                MCRC No. 1947 of 2026

                    Ishwar Chouhan S/o Late Indal Singh Aged About 37 Years R/o Aamapali, Post
                    Bhichia And Police Station Baradwar, District Sakti, Chhattisgarh.
                                                                                   --- Applicant
                                                         versus
                    State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line,
                    District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
                                                                                 --- Non-applicant

                                                MCRC No. 1976 of 2026

                    Ishwar Chouhan S/o Late Indal Singh Chouhan Aged About 37 Years Resident
                    Of Aamapali, Post Bichhiya And Police Station Baradwar, District- Sakti (C.G.)
       Digitally
       signed by
       PREETI                                                                        ---Applicant
PREETI KUMARI
KUMARI Date:
       2026.04.16
       11:38:51
                                                         Versus
       +0530
                    State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line,
                    District Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                                                                --- Non-applicant

                                                MCRC No. 1979 of 2026

                    Ishwar Chouhan Son Of Late Indal Singh Aged About 37 Years Resident Of
                    Aamapali, Post - Bhichia And Police Station Baradwar, District - Sakti,
                    Chhattisgarh.
                                                                                         ---Applicant
                                                         Versus


                    State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line,
                    District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
                                                                               --- Non-applicant
                                          2

                            MCRC No. 1948 of 2026

Ishwar Chouhan S/o Late Indal Singh Chouhan Aged About 37 Years R/o
Aamapali, Post- Bichhiya And Police Station- Baradwar, District- Sakti (C.G.)
                                                                  ---Applicant
                                     Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line,
District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                                                --- Non-applicant
For Applicant                 : Mr. Rahul Goswami, Advocate.
For Non-applicant/State       : Mr. Saumya Rai, Deputy Government Advocate.

                  Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
                              Order on Board


15.04.2026

1.    Since the above-mentioned four bail applications arise out of same

       applicant, they are clubbed and heard together and are being disposed

       of by this common order.

2.    These are the First bail applications filed under Section 483 of the

       Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS'), for grant

       of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with

       Crime No. 1213/2024 (in MCRC No. 1947/2026), Crime No. 1210/2024

       (in MCRC No. 1948/2026), Crime No. 1212/2024 (in MCRC

       No.1976/2026) and Crime No. 1211/2024 (in MCRC No. 1979/2026)

       registered at Police Station - Civil Line, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) for the

       offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)

       and 111 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.    Case of the prosecution in brief, is that the allegation against the

       applicant is that, along with co-accused persons, he cheated individuals

       by falsely promising employment as clerks in the Public Works

       Department and as G.D. Constables in the Police Department, as well as
                                       3

     jobs in the Jail Department as jail guards. In this regard, he allegedly

     collected several lakhs of rupees from various persons and issued fake

     appointment letters in their names. It is further alleged that fake

     appointment orders of the Public Works Department, Home Department,

     and the Government of Chhattisgarh, educational documents of

     unemployed youth, a fake daily attendance register related to the Labour

     Department, uniforms of the Jail Department, seals and stamps of the

     Forest Department, Women and Child Development Department, Labour

     Department, Water Resources Department, Home Department, and

     Health Department, as well as service books, along with cash amounting

     to Rs.10,50,000/- and other incriminating materials were seized from the

     applicant/accused.

4.   In MCRC No. 1947/2026 - Learned counsel for the applicants submits

     that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case.

     He further submitted that the applicant has not withdrawn any amount

     which is seized by the police as alleged against the applicant. He further

     submitted that the co-accused Rajendra Palange has granted regular bail

     vide its order dated 08.08.2025 in M.Cr.C No. 189/2025 and co-accused

     Sanjay Das Manikpuri (Mahant) has granted regular bail vide its order

     dated   26.08.2025    in   M.Cr.C    No.   6725/2025    and    co-accused

     Purushottam Tiwari has granted regular bail vide its order dated

     17.09.2025 in M.Cr.C No. 6598/2025 and co-accused GuruShankar

     Divya has granted regular bail vide its order dated 09.09.2025 in M.Cr.C

     No. 7179/2025, co-accused Kapileshwar Puri Goswami has granted

     regular bail vide its order dated 06.10.2025 in M.Cr.C No. 7126/2025

     and co-accused Rishi Nayak has been granted bail by this Court vide

     order dated 24.02.2026 passed in MCRC No. 327/2026.

5.   In MCRC No. 1948/2026 - Learned counsel for the applicant submits
                                      4

     that in this crime, co-accused Rajendra Palange has granted regular bail

     vide its order dated 08.08.2025 in M.Cr.C No. 5962/2025 and

     co-accused Sanjay Das Manikpuri (Mahant) has granted regular bail

     vide its order dated 26.08.2025 in M.Cr.C 6715/2025 and co-accused

     GuruShankar Divya has granted regular bail vide its order dated

     09.09.2025 in M.Cr.C No. 7169/2025 and co-accused Kapileshwar Puri

     Goswami has granted regular bail vide its order dated 06.10.2025 in

     M.Cr.C No. 7840/2025 and co-accused, namely, Rishi Nayak has been

     granted bail by this Court vide order dated 24.02.2026 passed in MCRC

     No. 266/2026.

6.   In MCRC No. 1976/2026 - Learned counsel for the applicant submits

     that in this crime, co-accused Rajendra Palange has granted regular bail

     vide its order dated 08.08.2025 in M.Cr.C No. 5864/2025 and

     co-accused Sanjay Das Manikpuri (Mahant) has granted regular bail

     vide its order dated 26.08.2025 in M.Cr.C No. 6706/2025 and

     co-accused Purushottam Tiwari has granted regular bail vide its order

     dated   17.09.2025   in   M.Cr.C    No.   6632/2025   and   co-accused

     GuruShankar Divya has granted regular bail vide its order dated

     09.09.2025 in M.Cr.C No. 7160/2025 and co-accused Kapileshwar Puri

     Goswami has granted regular bail vide its order dated 06.10.2025 in

     M.Cr.C No. 7843/2025 and co-accused, namely, Rishi Nayak has been

     granted bail by this Court vide order dated 24.02.2026 passed in MCRC

     No. 259/2026.

7.   In MCRC No. 1979/2026 - Learned counsel for the applicant submits

     that in this crime, co-accused Rajendra Palange has granted regular bail

     vide its order dated 14. 08.2025 in M.Cr.C No. 6233/2025 and

     co-accused Sanjay Das Manikpuri (Mahant) has granted regular bail

     vide its order dated 26.08.2025 in co-accused M.Cr.C 6728/2025 No.
                                         5

      and GuruShankar Divya has granted regular bail vide its order dated

      09.09.2025 in M.Cr.C. No. 7155/2025 and co-accused Kapileshwar Puri

      Goswami has granted regular bail vide its order dated 06.10.2025 in

      M.Cr.C No. 7817/2025 and co-accused, namely, Rishi Nayak has been

      granted bail by this Court vide order dated 24.02.2026 passed in MCRC

      No. 268/2026. Further, the charge-sheet has been filed and he is in jail

      since 20.01.2026. Thus, looking to the above, it is prayed that the

      applicant may be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.

8.    On the other hand, learned State counsel appearing for the

      respondent/State opposes the bail application and submits that the

      charge-sheet has been filed, but could not dispute the fact that the

      co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court.

9.    I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the

      document available on record.

10.   Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and

      gravity of the offence, and the allegations levelled against the applicant,

      and further considering that the charge-sheet has been filed before the

      competent Court and the applicant has been in custody since

      20.01.2026, and also taking into account the fact that identically situated

      co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court in all

      four crime numbers, as explained in the submissions of learned counsel

      for the applicant, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to

      be released on bail in the present case on the ground of parity.

11.   Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the Applicant -

      Ishwar Chouhan involved in Crime No. 1213/2024 (in MCRC No.

      1947/2026), Crime No. 1210/2024 (in MCRC No. 1948/2026), Crime

      No. 1212/2024 (in MCRC No.1976/2026) and Crime No. 1211/2024 (in
                                   6

MCRC No. 1979/2026) registered at Police Station - Civil Line, District -

Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 338,

336(3), 340(2), 61(2) and 111 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, be

released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in

the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following

conditions:-

      (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he

      shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for

      evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of

      default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to

      treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in

      accordance with law.

      (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on

      each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In

      case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court

      may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya

      Nyaya Sanhita.

      (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during

      trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under

      Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to

      appear before the court on the date fixed in such

      proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings

      against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the

      Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

      (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the

      trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii)

      framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under
                                               7

                    Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court

                    absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient

                    cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such

                    default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in

                    accordance with law.

         12.   Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the trial Court for

               necessary information and compliance forthwith.

                    -

Sd/-

(Ramesh Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE

Preeti

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter