Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kripal Ram Nishad vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2025 Latest Caselaw 4182 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4182 Chatt
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Kripal Ram Nishad vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 2 September, 2025

Digitally signed by
V PADMAVATHI
Date: 2025.09.04
11:10:03 +0530




                                                                                              2025:CGHC:44566

                                                                                                                   NAFR
                                HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                                        WPS No. 10269 of 2025

               1 - Kripal Ram Nishad S/o Late Shri Sakha Ram Nishad Aged About 62 Years R/o
               206, Village - Khudmuda, Post- Sankra, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh

               2 - Joharu Sahu S/o Late Shri Padruram Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o 398, Thakur
               Dev Para, Bhatagaon, Post- Sundar Nagar Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
                                                                                  ... Petitioner(s)

                                                                    versus

               1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department,
               Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantalaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur,
               Chhattisgarh.

               2 - Engineer-In-Chief Public Health Engineering Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal
               Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

               3 - Superntending Engineer Public Health Engineering, Near Khalsa School Pandri
               Circle Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

               4 - Executive Engineer P.H.E. Division, Near Khalsa School Pandri Circle Raipur,
               District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

               5 - Director Treasury, Account And Pension Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
                                                                                ...Respondents
                                           (Cause title is taken from the CIS)
               ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Petitioners : Shri Abhishek Singh, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms Anuja Sharma, PL

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 02.09.2025

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioners are retired

employees of the Public Health Engineering Department, and were working as Work

Charged Contingency paid employees. It is further submitted that in light of judgment

passed by this Court in WPS-3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram Patel, and others Vs State Wps 10269 of 2025

of Chhattisgarh and others), and other connected matters, decided on 30.09.2022,

present petitioners are also entitled for leave encashment.

2. Learned State counsel would submit that sufficient documents have not been

filed by the petitioners, and it is also not reflected as to whether the petitioners have

completed the minimum service to avail the benefit of leave encashment.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents on record.

4. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on merits of the case, this

petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to make a detailed

representation before the concerned respondent/ competent authority within a period

of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order with all necessary documents

to substantiate their claim. In that event, on due verification, if the petitioners are

found to be similarly situated persons as in the case of Faguvaram Patel (supra),

their claim shall be decided by the respondents in light of judgment passed in that

case expeditiously, preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of submission

of the said representation.

5. Accordingly, petition stands disposed of with aforesaid observation and

direction.

Sd/-

(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter