Santosh Tiwari And Ors vs Smt.Deepti Bajpai
2025 Latest Caselaw 2633 Chatt

Chattisgarh High Court

Santosh Tiwari And Ors vs Smt.Deepti Bajpai on 24 March, 2025

                                                                                    Page 1 of 1




                                                     Digitally
                                                     signed by
                                                     SAURABH
                                             SAURABH YADAV
                                             YADAV   Date:
                                                     2025.03.25
                                                     14:11:37
                                                     +0530




                                                                                     NAFR

                    HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                  CRR No. 697 of 2012

1. Santosh Tiwari S/o Kishun Tiwari, aged about 35 years

2. Smt. Chandrika Tiwari W/o Late Kishun Tiwari, aged about 62 years

3. Sanjay Tiwari S/o Late Shiri Kishun Tiwari, aged about 26 years

     All are R/o Masturi Near Kabadi Bali, Maharajin Nahar , Masturi , P.S. Masturi
     Distt. Bilaspur C.G. , District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
                                                                  ... Applicants
                                           Versus

     Smt. Deepti Bajpai W/o Santosh Tiwari, aged about 39 years R/o Through
     Shripati Bajpai, Azad Nagar Masanganj, Near Shiv Mandir Bilaspur , P.S. Civil
     Lines Bilaspur, District: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
                                                             ... Respondent(s)

For Applicants : Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For State/Respondent : Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Judgment on Board 24.03.2025

1. Learned counsel for both the parties jointly submit that dispute between the husband-applicant No. 1 and the respondent-wife has been settled amicably and they do not want to press this revision furthermore.

2. Accordingly, the present revision stands disposed of as not pressed.

Sd/-

(Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE

Saurabh