Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3121 Chatt
Judgement Date : 19 June, 2025
1
2025:CGHC:25677
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 5106 of 2025
1 - Subodh Sinha S/o. Balmukund Prasad Sinha Aged About 58 Years
Occupation - Teacher L.B. (T), Govt. Middle School, Ambikapur, R/o. Saksharta
Marg Ambikapur, Tahsil - Ambikapur, District - Surguja (C.G.)
--- Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department,
E And T, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava
Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.)
3 - District Education Officer Surguja, District - Surguja (C.G.)
4 - Block Education Officer Ambikapur, District - Surguja (C.G.)
5 - Janpad Panchayat Surguja, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, District -
Surguja (C.G.)
6 - Collector Surguja, District - Surguja (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nishi Kant Sinha, Advocate
For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ajit Singh, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Order on Board VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN
19/06/2025
1. The claim of the petitioner in the present petition is with regard to grant of
1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that with regard to award
of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has been issued
by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in
case of "Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others" in WA
No. 261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. The petitioner is
also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits
that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the
petitioner to make a representation to respondents/ competent authority
in light of order passed by this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023.
3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned
counsel for the petitioner.
4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned
counsel for petitioner, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting
the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in the
writ petition to respondents/competent authority annexing all relevant
documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA No. 261 of 2023.
On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents/
competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law,
considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of
this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023 within further period of four months from
the date of receipt of such representation.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits
of the case, and it is for respondents/competent authority to consider the
claim of petitioner on its own merits.
6. With this observation, the present writ petition stand disposed of.
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!