Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3048 Chatt
Judgement Date : 16 June, 2025
1
2025:CGHC:24298
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 4517 of 2025
1 - Smt. Kuleshwari Sahasi W/o Shri Devendra Sahasi Aged About 41 Years
Working As Headmaster, Govt. Primary School, Randha, Block - Keshkal,
District - Kondagaon (C.G.)
--- Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education
Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.)
2 - The Secretary Government Of Chhattisgarh, Panchayat And Rural
Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa
Raipur (C.G.)
3 - The District Education Officer Kondagaon, District - Kondagaon (C.G.)
4 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Kondagaon, District -
Kondagaon (C.G.)
5 - The Block Education Officer Keshkal, District - Kondagaon (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sahu, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Digitally
Order on Board signed by VEDPRAKASH VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN DEWANGAN Date:
2025.06.16 19:22:57 +0530
16/06/2025
1. The claim of the petitioner in the present petition is with regard to grant of
1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that with regard to award
of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has been issued
by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in
case of "Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others" in WA
No. 261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. The petitioner is
also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits
that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the
petitioner to make a representation to respondents/competent authority in
light of order passed by this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023.
3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned
counsel for the petitioner.
4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned
counsel for petitioner, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting
the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in the
writ petition to respondents/competent authority annexing all relevant
documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA No. 261 of 2023.
On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents/
competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law,
considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this
Court in WA No. 261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the
date of receipt of such representation.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of
the case, and it is for respondents/competent authority to consider the
claim of petitioner on its own merits.
6. With this observation, the present writ petition stand disposed of.
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!