Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishal Bagh vs The State Of Chhattisgarh
2025 Latest Caselaw 254 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 254 Chatt
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Vishal Bagh vs The State Of Chhattisgarh on 3 June, 2025

                                     1/4

                                                               Digitally signed
                                                               by BHOLA
                                                               NATH KHATAI
                                                               Date:
                                                               2025.06.03
                                                               14:53:21 +0530




        HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                  Order Sheet


                          CRA No. 845 of 2024

Vishal Bagh S/o Prabhulal Bagh Aged About 19 Years R/o Ward No. 29
Oodiya Mohalla Bapu Nagar Khuseepar, Tehsil And District Durg
Chhattisgarh (Complete Particular Of The Appellant As Per Chargesheet
Which Is Not Mentioned In The Cause Title Of The Impugned Judgment)
                                                                 ---Appellant
                                    Versus
The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police
Station Khurseepar District Durg, Chhattisgarh
                                                         --- Respondent

03/06/2025 Mr. Siddharth Pandey, counsel for appellant.

Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, G.A. for State.

Heard on I.A. No.02/2024 for suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

By the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 04.01.2024, learned Sessions Judge, Durg (CG) in Sessions Trial No.148/2021, has convicted the

appellant Vishal Bagh under section 307/34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years with fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for 1 month.

Learned counsel for appellant argues that the present appellant has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the dispute arose on account of distribution of liquor among the parties. There was no premeditation on the part of the present appellant to cause injuries to the complainant and due to some altercation between the parties, the incident took place. According to the doctor, there were two incised wounds, measuring 2 x 1 x 1 cm and 4 x 2 x 0.5 cm, on the left side chest of the injured but the doctor has not opined anything to show that the said injuries were sufficient to cause his death. Though the injury was grievous but it was not dangerous to life. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant was on bail during trial and he has not misused the aforesaid liberty granted by the Court. There are 3 other co-accused persons who have already been granted bail by this Court. At present, the appellant is in jail since 04.01.2024 and the appeal is likely to take sometime for its final disposal, therefore, the appellant may be granted the benefit of suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that the present appellant is the main accused who has inflicted blows on the chest of the injured/complainant and the injuries suffered by him are likely to cause his death. He further submits that the

appellant underwent medical treatment for 9 days. As such the bail application deserves to be dismissed.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the doctor in his injury report has not made any opinion in respect of the injuries sustained by the injured on his chest to be dangerous to life, further the knife was also not brought before the doctor for examination and also considering the fact that the appellant was on bail during trial and after conviction, he has already remained in jail for about 18 months, without commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to suspend the jail sentence imposed upon the appellant.

Accordingly, I.A. No. 2 of 2024 is allowed. The substantive jail sentence imposed upon appellant Vishal Bagh by the learned Trial Court is hereby suspended. The appellant shall be released on bail on his executing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance before the Registry of this Court on 24.07.2025. Thereafter, he shall appear before the concerned Trial Court on a date to be given by the Registry of this Court and shall continue to appear there on all such subsequent dates as are given to him by the said Court, interval being not less than 6 months, till final disposal of this appeal.

List this case for final hearing in due course. Consequently, I.A. No.03/2025 for urgent hearing and I.A. No.04/2025 for listing the case during summer vacation

stand disposed of.

List this case for final hearing in due course.

Sd/-

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Vacation Judge

Khatai

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter