Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ganesh Ram Chandrakar vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2025 Latest Caselaw 1269 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1269 Chatt
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Ganesh Ram Chandrakar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 17 January, 2025

                                              1




                                                             2025:CGHC:3058

                                                                         NAFR

                     HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Digitally
signed by
RAVI
SHANKAR
MANDAVI                             WPS No. 452 of 2025

            1 - Ganesh Ram Chandrakar S/o Late Goverdhan Lal Aged About 67
            Years Retired Assistant Wire Man Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M)
            Public Work Department, Mantralaya Sub Division Raipur, District
            Raipur                                                   Chhattisgarh.

            2 - Paras Ram Yadav S/o Late Goverdhan Yadav Aged About 65 Years
            Retired Assistant Wire Man Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M) Public
            Work Department, Mantralaya Sub Division Raipur, District Raipur
            Chhattisgarh.

            3 - Anand Ram Sahu S/o Late Dasru Ram Sahu Aged About 64 Years
            Retired Helper Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M) Public Work
            Department, Workshop Sub Division Raipur, District Raipur
            Chhattisgarh.

            4 - Mukesh Das S/o Late Sant Masih Das Aged About 63 Years Retired
            Chowkidar, Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M) Public Work
            Department, Workshop Sub Division Raipur, District Raipur
            Chhattisgarh.

            5 - Rakesh Chandra S/o Late Sant Masih Das Aged About 69 Years
            Retired Helper, Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M) Public Work
            Department, Workshop Sub Division Raipur, District Raipur
            Chhattisgarh.

            6 - Ramkrishan Nishad S/o Late Paras Ram Nishad Aged About 66
            Years Retired Helper, Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M) Public Work
            Department, Workshop Sub Division Raipur, District Raipur
            Chhattisgarh.
                                    2

7 - Lakhan Lal Kenwat S/o Late Nakchhed Kenwat Aged About 65 Years
Retired Helper, Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M) Public Work
Department, Workshop Sub Division Raipur, District Raipur
Chhattisgarh.

8 - Onkar Prasad Baghel S/o Late Manrakhan Lal Baghel Aged About
63 Years Retired Vehicle Driver, Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M)
Public Work Department, Workshop Sub Division Raipur, District Raipur
Chhattisgarh.
                                                    ... Petitioner(s)


                                versus


1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department
Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur
Chhattisgarh.

2 - Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan Sector
19 North Block Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department (E And M) Mandal Office
Sirpur Bhawan Behind Aakashwani Civil Line Raipur District Raipur
Chhattisgarh.

4 - Superintending Engineer Public Works Department (E And M)
Mandal Office Sirpur Bhawan Behind Aakashwani Civil Line Raipur
District                  Raipur                   Chhattisgarh.

5 - Executive Engineer (E And M) Public Works Department Raipur
Division          District        Raipur           Chhattisgarh.

6 - Joint Director Pension, Account And Treasury Department, Raipur
Division, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
                                                  ... Respondent(s)

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nilu Kumari Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board

17/01/2025

1. Heard Ms. Nilu Kumari Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners

as well as Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, learned Panel Lawyer for the

State/respondent/s.

2. Since the matter is heard and decided finally, therefore, I.A.

No.01/2025, which is an application for exemption from filing

typed copies of annexure is allowed.

3. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for

following reliefs:

"10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the writ petition and be pleased to issue an order/direction to the respondent authorities to grant the benefit of leave encashment to the petitioners. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be call for the records for its kind perusal which relates to petitioner's matter.

10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioners."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners

were working as work charged Contingency Paid employees in

the Public Works Department. Initially they were employed on

temporary basis, thereafter their services were regularized. After

completion of age of superannuation, they retired from service.

The respondent authorities granted pension and gratuity to the

petitioners but benefit of leave encashment is not granted to them.

It is further submitted that the rules of payment of leave

encashment is governed by the M.P. Work- charged /contingency

Paid Employees Leave Rules 1977, which has been made by

erstwhile State of Madhay Pradesh and has been adopted by the

state of C.G. under the exercise of power conferred under article

309 of Constitution of India. The petitioners are entitle for benefit

of leave encashment as per provision of rule 1977. Learned

counsel for the petitioners submits that in the light of judgment

passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No.3870 of 2021

(Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.) and

other connected matters decided on 30.09.2022, the petitioners

are entitled for leave encashment.

5. Learned State counsel submits that sufficient documents have not

been filed by the petitioners and it is also not reflected as to

whether the petitioners have completed the minimum period of

service to avail the benefit of leave encashment.

6. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the

documents available in record.

7. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on the merits, this

petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to make

detailed representation before the concerned

respondent/competent authority within the period of '30 days'

from the date of receipt of copy of this order with all necessary

documents to substantiate their claim. In the event of filing of

representation, on due verification, if the petitioners are found to

be similarly situated persons, as in the case of Faguvaram Patel

(surpa), their claim shall be decided by the respondents in light of

judgment of Faguvaram Patel (Supra) expeditiously preferably

within the period of '90 days' from the date of submission of their

said representation.

8. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of with aforesaid

observations and directions.

Sd/-

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter