Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1987 Chatt
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2025
1/2
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ACQA No. 495 of 2024
SMT. REKHA GUPTA versus BALARAM CHANDRAVANSHI
Order Sheet
18/02/2025 Mr. Akash Shrivastava, counsel for the appellant.
Ms. Sharmaila Singhai, Sr. Advocate with Ms.
Shiwali Bansal, counsel for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the learned trial Court has committed illegality in relying upon Section 56 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as in the present case, Section 56 of the Act has no role to play because the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- has been given after submission of cheque to the bank and after issuance of notice also, therefore, Section 56 of the Act, is not applicable.
Per contra, learned Sr. counsel for the respondent would submit that Section 56 of the Act, is applicable in the present case as they have not endorsed the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- which they have received.
Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the judgment referred to by learned trial Court in case of Dashrathbhai Trikambhai Patel vs. Hitesh Mahendra Bhai Patel and another, reported in
(2023) 1 SCC 578 is not applicable.
Let the factual position be clarified by the parties whether Section 56 of the Act, is applicable in case where the cheque has been dishonoured and thereafter the accused has paid the part payment of the amount and whether it is incumbent upon the complainant to RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU mention this fact in the notice or in the complaint.
List this case on 5-3-2025 in motion hearing.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Raju
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!