Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1958 Chatt
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2025
1/4
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRA No. 1102 of 2004
GALESHWAR versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Order Sheet
17/02/2025 Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, learned counsel for the
appellant/s.
Ms. M. Asha, P.L. for the respondent/State.
In compliance of non-bailable warrant issued by this
Court on 03.01.2025, appellant is produced before this
Court identified by A.S.I. Ashwani Warma and Constable
Dinesh Nirala presently posted at Police Station - Kotwali
Korba District- Korba (C.G.)
Heard on I.A. No.01/2025, an application for
suspension of sentence and release appellant on personal
bond.
By the impugned judgment dated 08.12.2004
passed by the A.S.J., Korba C.G. in Sessions Trial No.
97/04, appellant stands convicted for the offence
punishable mentioned as under:
Conviction Sentence U/s. 314 of the Indian R.I. for 05 years with fine Penal Code. of Rs. 1,000/- (in default of six months R.I.)
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant
submits that by impugned judgment dated 08.12.2004
passed by the A.S.J., Korba C.G. in Sessions Trial No.
97/04, appellant has been convicted for offence
punishable under Section 314 of I.P.C. and sentenced to
undergo R.I. for five years with fine of Rs. 1,000/- with
default stipulation. Substantive sentence imposed upon
appellant was suspended by this Court vide order dated
01.02.2005 and in compliance of that, appellant was
released on bail. Appellant was regularly appearing before
this Court and on last date of appearance i.e. 15.10.2024,
next date of appearance was given as 09.04.2025. On
06.12.2024, counsel for appellant has not appeared and
therefore, bailable warrant of Rs. 20,000/- was issued
against appellant which could not be served and
thereafter on 03.01.2025, non-bailable warrant was
issued. He further contended that appellant is regularly
appearing before this Court and never misused liberty
granted to him. As counsel for appellant could not appear,
bailable and non-bailable warrant was issued and for
default of counsel, appellant should not suffer, hence, this
application for suspension of sentence may be allowed
and appellant may be released on personal bond.
On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for
the State opposes the submissions advanced by counsel
for the appellant.
Heard.
Taking into consideration submission made by
learned counsel for the parties and also considering the
fact that substantive jail sentence imposed upon appellant
was suspended by this Court and he was regularly
appearing before the Registry of this Court, therefore, I am
inclined to allow this application.
Execution of substantive jail sentence imposed on
the appellant shall remain suspended and he is directed to
be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for a
sum of Rs. 30,000/- to be sworn before Registrar
(Judicial)/ Additional Registrar (Judicial) of this Court and
appellant shall appear on 21.04.2025 before the Registry
of this Court and on the further dates given to him and
shall continue to appear there on all such subsequent
dates as given to him, till the disposal of this appeal.
In view of the above, I.A. No.01/2025, application
for suspension of sentence and release appellant on
personal bond is allowed.
As the case is of the year 2004, let it be listed in the
week after next.
Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI Shayna
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!