Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hanuman Prasad Sinha vs Bhagwantin Paikara
2025 Latest Caselaw 1607 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1607 Chatt
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Hanuman Prasad Sinha vs Bhagwantin Paikara on 7 August, 2025

                                                            1




                             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                                   CRR No. 976 of 2025
                   •   Hanuman Prasad Sinha, S/o Kaluram Sinha, Aged About 55 Years, R/o
                       Quarter No. A/6, Sinchai Colony, Rudri, Tahsil And District Dhamtari
                       (C.G.).                                                             ... Applicant
                                                         versus
                   •   Bhagwantin Paikara, W/o Rambhagat Paikara, Aged About 49 Years, R/o
                       Quarter No. H/21, Sinchai Colony, Rudri, Tahsil And District Dhamtari
                       (C.G.).                                                        ... Respondent

(Cause title taken from Case Information System)

Order Sheet

07/08/2025 Mr. Jitendra Gupta, counsel for the applicant.

Heard on admission.

Admit.

Issue notice to the respondent on payment of PF as per

rules.

Also heard on I.A. No.01/2025, application for grant of stay

of effect and operation of order dated 14.07.2025.

By the impugned judgment of conviction and order of

sentence dated 24.07.2025 (Annexure-A/1) passed by the

learned Additional Sessions Judge Dhamtari, District Dhamtari

(C.G.) in Criminal Appeal No.80/2024, applicant has been

convicted and sentenced as under :-

Digitally DEEPTI signed by JHA DEEPTI NIRALA JHA NIRALA

S.No. Conviction Sentence

01. u/s 138 of the S. I. For 3 months and Negotiable Instruments compensation amount Act, 1881 of Rs.5,30,000/-, in default of payment of compensation, further S.I. for 2 months.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is no

material on record on the basis of which the applicant's conviction

can be sustained. Only a short sentence of 3 months has been

imposed upon the applicant. The applicant is in jail since

24.07.2025 i.e., from the date of passing of judgment and he is

ready to abide by all the terms and conditions which may be

imposed upon him while suspending the jail sentence of the

applicant and the recovery of compensation. The conclusion of

this revision petition is likely to take considerable time; therefore,

the applicant may be released on bail, and the substantive jail

sentence of the applicant may be suspended till final disposal of

this case. He also prayed that the recovery of compensation may

also be suspended till final disposal of the case.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as

also the fact that the applicant has been punished with a short

sentence of 3 months' simple imprisonment and a compensation

of Rs.5,30,000/- and the applicant is ready to abide by any terms

and conditions imposed by this Court, at this stage, I am inclined

to allow I.A. No.1/2025 subject to deposit 50% of the cheque

amount by the applicant within a period of 60 days from today, the

recovery of the remaining compensation amount shall remain

stayed till the final disposal of the instant revision.

Accordingly, I.A. No. 01/2025 is allowed. The substantive

jail sentence of the applicant shall remain suspended till final

disposal of the instant revision petition and he shall be released

on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.

25,000/- with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the

trial Court for his appearance before the Registry of this Court on

26th September, 2025. He shall thereafter appear before the

concerned trial Court on a date to be given by the Registry of this

Court and thereafter, continue to appear before the trial Court on

all such subsequent dates as are given to him by the said Court

till disposal of this case.

After due verification, the complainant would be at liberty to

withdraw the amount deposited by the applicant with a condition

to return the said amount whenever the Court directs.

Call for records of the trial Court.

List this case thereafter.

Sd/-

(Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter