Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3997 Chatt
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2025
1
2025:CGHC:18987
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 2854 of 2025
Digitally
signed by
SHOAIB
1 - Hemlal Agrawani S/o Late Mukundram Agrawani Aged About 68
SHOAIB ANWAR
ANWAR Date:
2025.04.28
23:11:11
+0530 Years Retired Headmaster, Government Primary School, Albelapara,
Cluster Centre, Basanwahi, Block - Narharpur, District- North Bastar
Kanker (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of
Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur,
District Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal
Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
3 - Divisional Joint Director Public Instruction, Bastar Division, Jagdalpur,
District- Bastar (C.G.)
2
4 - District Education Officer District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.)
5 - Block Education Officer Block- Narharpur, District- North Bastar
Kanker (C.G.)
6 - Divisional Joint Director Treasury, Account And Pension, Bastar
Division, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS)
For Petitioner(s) : Shri Punit Ruparel, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 28.04.2025
Heard.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is
entitled for Kramonnati as per the last circular issued by the
Government on 08.08.2018 (Annexure P-6) as he has completed 30
years of service. He would further submit that the earlier circulars to
grant Kramonnati issued on 19.04.1999, 28.04.2008, 03.10.2008,
11.01.2010 and lastly on 08.08.2008 according to that since the
petitioner has completed 30 years of service, she would be entitled
for third time pay-scale. He submits that the issue involved in the
present petition has already been considered and decided by this
Court in the matter of R.S. Verma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and
Others (W.P. (S) No. 2805/2002 by judgment and order dated
29.08.2006). He further submits that the petitioner may be granted
liberty to make representation to consider the case of the petitioner
in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the
matter of State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004
SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (Supra) to which
learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.
2. Accordingly, as per the liberty sought for by the petitioner, the
petitioner is granted liberty to make representation before the
concerned authority. It is expected that the competent authority
subject to verification shall decide the representation of the
petitioner as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner
preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of
copy of this order.
3. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid
liberty.
Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge
Shoaib
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!