Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3993 Chatt
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2025
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRA No. 1744 of 2024
1 - Chandan Vishwakarma S/o Late Sudama Vishwakarma Aged About 23 Years
R/o Jamnipali Asha Nagar Lata, Police Station - District - Korba (C.G.)
... Appellant(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House Officer, Police Station -
Kotwali Korba, District - Korba (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
Order Sheet
28/04/2025 Mr. Maya Chaturvijani, learned counsel for the appellant.
Ms. Pragya Shrivastava, learned Dy. G.A. appearing for
the respondent/State.
Heard on I.A. No. 1/2024, which is an application under
Section 430 of BNSS, 2023 for suspension of sentence and grant
of bail.
The appellant has been convicted and sentenced by the
judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.05.2024,
passed by Learned Additional Session Judge, (FTC), Korba,
District Korba in Sessions Trial No. 109/2023, in the following
manner with a direction to run all the sentences concurrently:-
Conviction Sentence
U/s 376(2)(n) of IPC RI for 10 years and fine of Rs.
1000/- in default of payment of
fine amount additional RI for 03
months.
U/s 506 Part-II of Indian Penal RI for 06 months and fine of Rs.
Code 500/- in default of payment of
fine amount additional RI for
one month.
All the sentences shall run concurrently.
Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the
victim was aged about 19 years and was having love affair with
the appellant, she herself eloped with him on her own will and
engaged in making consensual physical relation. Both of them
have gone to perform marriage and executed an affidavit before
the Notary at Katghora, District Korba, It is only upon the
pressure of her parents, she lodged the report against the
appellant. She admitted in her evidence that she has not
disclosed about the execution of such notarized affidavit to her
parents. She being the major girl having visited various places
along with the appellant have not made any complaint to anyone
and has not raised any objection. The appellant was on bail
during the trial and presently he is in jail from the date of the
judgment i.e. on 06.05.2024. The appeal is of the year 2024 and
final adjudication of the appeal will take its own time, therefore, he
may be released on bail.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for
the parties, considering the nature of allegation and evidence
available on record, particularly the evidence of the victim as also
the document Ex.D-1 and Ex.D-2, further that the appellant is in
jail since 06.05.2024 and final adjudication of the appeal will take
its own time, I am inclined to allow the application and release the
appellant on bail.
Accordingly, I.A. No. 01/2024, is allowed.
It is directed that the substantive jail sentence
imposed upon the appellant shall remain suspended during
the pendency of this appeal and he shall be released on bail
on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/-
with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the
concerned trial Court for his appearance before the Registry
of this Court on 18.06.2025 and thereafter appear before the
concerned trial Court on a date to be fixed by the Registry of
this Court and shall continue to appear there on all such
subsequent dates as are given to him by the said Court, till
disposal of this appeal.
List this case for final hearing in due course.
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge
Digitally signed by ALOK ALOK SHARMA SHARMA Date:
2025.04.28 19:34:28 +0530
Alok
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!