Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ku. Pooja Sahu vs Chhattisgarh Vyavasayik Pariksha ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 3937 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3937 Chatt
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Ku. Pooja Sahu vs Chhattisgarh Vyavasayik Pariksha ... on 24 April, 2025

                                                        1




                                                                                 2025:CGHC:18631
                                                                                           NAFR
                       HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                              WPC No. 2026 of 2025

            1 - Ku. Pooja Sahu D/o Shri Tibhu Ram Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o Rajeev
            Gandhi Nagar, Bhajandipa, Ward No.-36, Raigarh, Distt. - Raigarh (C.G.)
                                                                               ... Petitioner(s)

                                                     versus

            1 - Chhattisgarh Vyavasayik Pariksha Mandal (Cgvyapam) Through - Controller,
            Vyapam Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur
            (C.G.)
            2 - Exam Controller Chhattisgarh Vyawasayik Pariksha Mandal (Cgvyapam),
            Vyapam Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur
            (C.G.)
                                                                         ... Respondent(s)

(Cause-title is taken from Case Information System)

For Petitioner : Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate

For Respondents : Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate

SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board 24/04/2025

1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following relief:-

"10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue necessary directions to the respondent authorities to consider the claim of the petitioner.

10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue direction to the respondent Digitally authorities to correct the caste status OBC signed by SHAYNA Creamy Layer to OBC Non-Creamy Layer and KADRI after correction to issue the certificate of Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) in favour of the petitioner.

10.3 That, any appropriate writ, direction or order may also kindly be passed in rfavour of the petitioner, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner made an

application to appear in the Teacher Eligibility Test conducted by the

respondents for the year 2024. While filling the online form, the petitioner

inadvertently in category (Caste) mentioned as OBC (Creamy Layer). He

submits that the mistake was inadvertent, in fact the petitioner belongs to

OBC (Non Creamy Layer) therefore, he submits that the respondents may be

directed to consider the case of the petitioner and the category of the

petitioner may be changed from OBC (Creamy Layer) to OBC (Non Creamy

Layer).

3. Learned counsel for the respondents opposes the submission and submits

that the specific guidelines have been framed before filling of the online

forms and according to the guidelines, any mistake can be corrected till the

last date of filling of the form and after three days of the last date filling of the

form. He submits that the similar matter had came up before this Court in WA

No. 770 of 2024, order dated 21.11.2024 (Dharmendra Kumar vs.

Chhattisgarh Vyavasyik Pariksha Mandal and another) whereby Division

Bench of this Court did not accept the submissions in that regard and

therefore, the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the Judgment as

stated above.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

5. The case of the petitioner is that while filling of the online form for appearing

in the TET examination 2024, inadvertently in the category (Caste), the

petitioner has filled the form as OBC (Creamy Layer). She want to change

the category status in the form as OBC (Non Creamy Layer).

6. Perusal of guidelines which is placed on record by respondents counsel, it is

very categorically stated that a details instruction were given before filling of

the online form and it is also indicated therein that any correction in online

form could have be made till the last date of filling of the form and thereafter

within a further period of three days. In the opinion of this Court, the

submission of the petitioner cannot be accepted in light of order passed by

Division Bench of this Court in WA No. 770 of 2024, order dated 21.11.2024

(Dharmendra Kumar vs. Chhattisgarh Vyavasyik Pariksha Mandal and

another) and guidelines issued by the respondents in this regard. Therefore,

I do not find any merits in this writ petition.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-


                                                     (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Shayna                                                         JUDGE
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter