Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vikram Rathore vs Atal Bihari Vajpayee Vishwavidyalaya
2025 Latest Caselaw 3529 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3529 Chatt
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Vikram Rathore vs Atal Bihari Vajpayee Vishwavidyalaya on 7 April, 2025

                                                          1/5




        Digitally
        signed by
        RAVI
RAVI    SHANKAR
SHANKAR MANDAVI


                              HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MANDAVI Date:
        2025.04.07
        18:42:15
        +0530




                                                 WPC No. 1812 of 2025

                     VIKRAM RATHORE versus ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE VISHWAVIDYALAYA

                                                     Order Sheet



                     07/04/2025         Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhagat, learned counsel for the

                                  petitioners.

                                        Mr.      Satish   Gupta,   learned   GA   for   the

                                  State/respondent/s appears on advance copy.

Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate appears on behalf of

Mr. Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, learned counsel for the

respondent No.1 to 4/ABVU.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

vide letter dated 08.11.2024, the Registrar, Atal Bihari

Vajpayee University, Bilaspur has approved wait listed

candidates under Clause 5 (f) of Order No.13. The

petitioners were allotted for Ph.D. seats under Mentor

Savitri Tripathi and two vacancies arose due to

completion of candidature of 2016 Batch Ph.D. course

Scholars. Thereafter, on 19.11.2024, the petitioners took

admission and paid the necessary fees and formerly

enrolled in the College for pursuing Ph.D. Course. Vide

memo dated 05.02.2025, the Registar, Atal Bihari

Vajpayee University, Bilaspur questioned the legality of

the admission of five candidates including the present

petitioners and vide order 02.04.2025, the Registar, Atal

Bihari Vajpayee University, Bilaspur has rejected the

petitioners Exam Application (DEC.-2024) for Pre Ph.D

(Course Work) English Examination 2023-2024

scheduled to be held on 08/09 of April, 2025.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed this

petition and prayed at-least the petitioners may be

allowed to appear in the said examination and the

appearance of the petitioners in the said examination

would be outcome of the said petition. The results of the

petitioners may also be withheld, but if the petitioners

were not permitted to appear in the said examination it

will cause injustice and irreparable loss to their future

career.

On the other hand learned counsel for the

respondents submits that it will not make any difference

as the petitioners have been illegally admitted by the

College and whatever rights has been accrued in favour

of the petitioners as such, no interim relief can be granted

to the petitioners. He has placed reliance upon the on the

judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of

Guru Nanak Dev University vs. Parminder Kr. Bansal

and others reported in (1993) 4 SCC 401 and in the

matter of Mahatama Gandhi University & Anr. vs. GIS

Jose & Ors. reported in (2008) 13 SCR 201 and he

submits that in academic cases interim relief can not be

granted.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and

peruse the material available on record.

From the perusal of the letter dated 08.11.2024, it

appears that the Registar, Atal Bihari Vajpayee University,

Bilaspur has approved their candidature and thereafter,

the petitioners took admission and paid the necessary

fees and formerly enrolled in the College for pursuing

Ph.D. Course, as such, taking into consideration of the

above fact and further considering the fact that they have

prepared for the examination for Pre Ph.D (Course Work)

English Examination 2023-2024, as such, this Court

deems it appropriate to allow the petitioners to appaer in

the said examination scheduled to be held on 8 th and 9th

of April, 2025, however, this would be subject to the final

outcome of this petition. The results of the petitioners

would not be declared without permission of this Court.

Issue notice to the respondents No.5 & 6, Mr.

Satish Gupta, learned GA for the State/respondent/s

appearing on advance copy accepts notice. PF need not

to be paid for issuance on notice to the said respondents.

The respondents appearing on advance copy are

directed to file reply on or before next date of hearing.

List this case for further hearing in the week

commencing 5th May, 2025.

Mr. Coubey, Advocate appearing on behalf of

respondents No.1 to 4 is directed to communicate about

the passing of this order to the concerned authorities.

Certified copy today.

Sd/-

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

Ravi Mandavi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter