Lahurman Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2024 Latest Caselaw 178 Chatt

Chattisgarh High Court

Lahurman Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 25 June, 2024

Author: Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench: Narendra Kumar Vyas

                                                                                 Page 1 of 1

                                                                                      NAFR
                          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                                         WPS No. 3282 of 2024
                       Lahurman Yadav S/o Ramman Yadav, Aged About 70 Years
                       R/o Village Katghora, Ward No. 6, Post Katghora, District- Korba
                       (Cg.)
                                                                         ---- PETITIONER
                                                Versus
                 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works
                    Department Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
                 2. Superintendent Engineer Public Works Department Bilaspur
                    Circle Bilaspur (C.G.)
                 3. Executive engineer,       PWD     Korba   Division     District   Korba,
                    Chhattisgarh.
                 4. Joint Director Treasury And Pension Bilaspur, District Bilaspur
                    (C.G.)
                                                                   --------RESPONDENTS

__________________________________________________________ For the Petitioners : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent/State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, PL _________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 25/06/2024.

1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022].

2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra).

3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge

Santosh