Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. K. Someshwari vs Smt. M. Kalyani
2022 Latest Caselaw 3193 Chatt

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3193 Chatt
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2022

Chattisgarh High Court
Smt. K. Someshwari vs Smt. M. Kalyani on 2 May, 2022
                   HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                               SA No. 617 of 2018

1. Smt. K. Someshwari D/o Late M. Venkateshwar Rao Aged About 68 Years W/o K.
   Satyarajlu, R/o- Qr. No. 20, Res Colony, Bijapur, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh.,
   District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh
2. Smt. K. Asha D/o Late M. Venkateshwar Rao Aged About 50 Years W/o K.
   Ramkrishna, R/o- Qr. No. 20, Res Colony, Bijapur, District- Bijapur,
   Chhattisgarh., District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh
3. Smt. V. Indira D/o Late M. Venkateshwar Rao Aged About 65 Years W/o K.
   Ramkrishna, R/o Sector-4 Street 14, House No. 15e, Bhilai, District- Durg,
   Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
4. Smt. K. Annapurna D/o Late M. Venkateshwar Rao Aged About 56 Years W/o
   K. Nagbhushnam Rao, R/o Door No. 45-49-2/1 Amit Nagar, Akkaiyapalem,
   Vishakatapatanam, Andhra Pradesh., District : Visakhapatnam, Andhra
   Pradesh
5. Smt. K. Durga D/o Late M. Venkateshwar Rao Aged About 45 Years W/o
   K.V.S. Pramanand, R/o House No. 09-327, Narsimha Nagar, Vishakapatnam,
   Andhra Pradesh., District : Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh
6. Smt. K. Vishaka D/o Late M. Venkateshwar Rao Aged About 50 Years W/o K.
   Maleshwar Rao, R/o House No. 09-327, Narsimha Nagar, Vishakapatnam,
   Andhra Pradesh., District : Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh
7. Smt. K. Bhagyalakshmi D/o Late M. Venkateshwar Rao Aged About 52 Years
   W/o K. Satyanarayan, R/o Plot No.12, 2nd Floor, Premium Palace- 2,
   Vishakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh., District : Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh
8. Smt. K. Shanti D/o Late M. Venkateshwar Rao Aged About 63 Years W/o K.
   Satyam , R/o Plot No.- 24, Sector-10, Mvp Colony, Vishakatpatnam, Andhra
   Pradesh., District : Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh      ---- Petitioners
                                     Versus
1. Smt. M. Kalyani W/o Late M.G. Tilak Aged About 48 Years R/o Main Road, Bijapur,
   Chhattisgarh., District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh
2. M. Poorna Vighaneshwar Rao S/o Late M. Venkateshwar Rao Aged About 48
   Years R/o Main Road, Bijapur, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh., District :
   Bijapur, Chhattisgarh
3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector,             Bijapur,   District- Bijapur,
   Chhattisgarh., District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh                 ---- Respondents

7-3

02-5-2022 Mr.Keshav Dewangan,counsel for the appellants.

Mr. Ravi Maheswari, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3/State.

Heard on admission.

Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that the

appellants who were daughters of deceased M. Venkateshwar Rao,

had filed a suit for declaration and partition of the property inherited

by their father as mentioned in Schedule-A of the plaint. He would

further submit that learned trial court without applying the provisions

of Hindu Succession Act (Amendment) has dismissed the suit.

Against that, they preferred an appeal which was also dismissed by

the learned First Appellate Court. Against that, the instant second

appeal has been preferred by the plaintiffs/appellants. He would

further submit that Hon'ble the Supreme Court in subsequent

judgment in case of Vinita Sharma vs. Rakesh Sharma and others,

reported in 2020 (9) SCC 1 has examined the application of Hindu

Succession Act and held that the daughters are entitled to get

share as co-parceners since their birth, unless partition as provided

in (amendment Act ) has been done, they are entitled to get their

share.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, the appeal is arguable.

The instant appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of

of law.

"Whether both the courts below were justified in dismissing the suit ignoring the provisions of Hindu Succession Act as amended in 2005 giving right to the daughters to inherit the property"?. Issue notice along with copy of this order to respondents No.1

and 2 by ordinary mode as well as by registered mode. PF be paid

within a week. Notice be made returnable in six weeks.

Also heard on I.A.No. 1 of 2018, which is an application for

grant of injunction.

Considering the facts, it is directed that the partition

proceedings may go on, but no final order shall be passed, till the

next date of hearing.

In view of above, I.A.No.1 of 2018 stands disposed of.

List this case after six weeks.

Sd/-

(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge

Raju

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter