Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Sangeeta Manohar Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2022 Latest Caselaw 1241 Chatt

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1241 Chatt
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2022

Chattisgarh High Court
Smt. Sangeeta Manohar Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 March, 2022
                                     1

                                                                       NAFR
             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                         WA No. 114 of 2022
Smt. Sangeeta Manohar Sahu W/o Shri Manohar Sahu Aged About 52
Years President Janpad Panchayat, Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-
Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
                                                        ---- Appellant
                              Versus

1.    State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat
      Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2.    The Collector, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

3.    The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)         Bhatapara,    District   :
      Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

4.    The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Bhatapara, District :
      Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

5.    Surendra Yadu S/o Jhaduram Yadu, Member Janpad Member
      Constituency No. 6, R/o Akaltara, Tahsil - Bhatapara, District :
      Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

6.    Hemant S/o Kejuram Dhruw Aged About 30 Years Janpad Member
      Constituency No. 4, R/o Village- Madhuban, Tahsil- Bhatapara,
      District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

7.    Narendra Kumar Yadav S/o Chintaram Yadav Aged About 30 Years
      Janpad Member Constituency No. 14, R/o Village- Gudeliya, Tahsil-
      Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

8.    Rameshwar S/o Tungnath Aged About 48 Years Janpad Member
      Constituency No. 5, R/o Village- Kadar, Tahsil- Bhatapara, District :
      Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

9.    Khilawan Prasad Chaturvedi S/o Kamta Prasad Chaturvedi Aged
      About 50 Years Janpad Member Constituency No. 22, R/o Village-
      Gurra, Tahsil- Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara,
      Chhattisgarh

10.   Smt. Sumitra W/o Parmeshwar Verma Aged About 42 Years Janpad
      Member Constituency No. 10, R/o Village- Kodwa, Tahsil- Bhatapara,
      District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

11.   Smt. Shailkumari W/o Shri Naresh Netam Aged About 38 Years
      Janpad Member Constituency No. 8, R/o Village- Nipaniya, Tahsil-
      Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
                                      2

12.   Smt. Shakuntala W/o Ramashankar Patel Aged About 45 Years
      Janpad Member Constituency No. 15, R/o Village- Karhibazar, Tahsil-
      Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

13.   Smt. Pali Bai W/o Anil Diwakar Aged About 50 Years Janpad Member
      Constituency No. 17, R/o Village- Borsi, Tahsil- Bhatapara, District :
      Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

14.   Smt. Subhadra W/o Santosh Dhruw Aged About 32 Years Janpad
      Member Constituency No. 9, R/o Village- Bharatpur, Tahsil-
      Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

15.   Smt. Jamuna W/o Manharan Yadu Aged About 50 Years Janpad
      Member Constituency No. 11, R/o Village- Lalpur, Tahsil- Bhatapara,
      District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

16.   Narsingh Yadav S/o Baburam Yadav Aged About 42 Years Janpad
      Member Constituency No. 13, R/o Village- Khaira, Tahsil- Bhatapara,
      District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

17.   Smt. Nandani W/o Avinash Aged About 22 Years Janpad Member
      Constituency No. 16, R/o Village- Kosmanda, Tahsil- Bhatapara,
      District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

18.   Smt. Bhagwati W/o Santosh Lahre Aged About 26 Years Janpad
      Member Constituency No. 18, R/o Village- Kalmidih, Tahsil-
      Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

19.   Shri Itwari Jangde S/o Jhaduram Jangde Aged About 50 Years
      Janpad Member Constituency No. 23, R/o Village- Rajadhar, Tahsil-
      Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

20.   Rameshar Dhruw S/o Vishram Dhruw Aged About 40 Years Janpad
      Member Constituency No. 12, R/o Village- Patan, Tahsil- Bhatapara,
      District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

21.   Smt. Santoshi Dore W/o Deepak Dore Aged About 36 Years Janpad
      Member Constituency No. 25, R/o Village- Tikuliya, Tahsil-
      Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

22.   Smt. Swati Verma W/o Dinesh Verma Aged About 34 Years Janpad
      Member Constituency No. 20, R/o Village- Maldi, Tahsil- Bhatapara,
      District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

23.   Smt. Parvati Yadav W/o Rajendra Yadav Aged About 29 Years
      Janpad Member Constituency No. 21, R/o Village- Mirgi, Tahsil-
      Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

                                                           ---- Respondents

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

__________________________________________________________ For Appellant : Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate For Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 : Mr. R.M. Solapurkar, Government Advocate For Respondent Nos.5 to 23 : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate ___________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice

Hon'ble Shri Gautam Chourdiya, Judge

Judgment on Board

Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice

10.03.2022 Heard Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, learned counsel for the appellant.

Also heard Mr. R.M. Solapurkar, learned Government Advocate, appearing

for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel,

appearing for respondent Nos. 5 to 23.

2. This appeal is directed against an order dated 28.02.2022 passed by

the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 1083 of 2022.

3. The respondent Nos. 5 to 23, who are the members of Janpad

Panchayat, had brought a no confidence motion dated 08.02.2022 against

the appellant, who is the president of the Janpad Panchayat. The writ

petition was filed by the appellant contending violation of Rule 3 of the

Chhattisgarh Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Ke Sarpanch Thatha Up-

Sarpanch, Janpad Panchayat Thatha Zila Panchayat ke President Thatha

Vice-President Ke Virudh Avishwas Prastav) Niyam, 1994 (for short, 'Rules

of 1994'). Amongst others, it was contended that the prescribed authority

did not satisfy himself about the admissibility of the notice of no confidence

motion issued by respondent Nos. 5 to 23 and that the prescribed authority

did not call the meeting within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt

of the notice.

4. Mr. Pradhan has submitted that the learned Single Judge did not

advert to the stipulation of fixing the date for meeting of the Janpad

Panchayat within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice,

as required under Rule 3 of the Rules of 1994. It is further submitted that

the learned Single Judge erroneously held that the proceeding would not

get vitiated only because of the fact that the prescribed authority, namely,

the Collector, asked the Chief Executive Officer of the Janpad Panchayat to

get the notice scrutinized instead of doing it himself. Mr. Pradhan further

submits that meeting for holding the no confidence motion is now fixed on

11.03.2022 by the Collector.

5. At this juncture, Mr. Agrawal submits that the respondent Nos. 5 to 23

will submit a fresh no confidence motion instead of entering into the

controversy in this writ appeal proceedings as to whether the provision for

fixing the date of the meeting by the prescribed authority within a period of

15 days from the date of receipt of the notice is mandatory or not and that

the respondent Nos. 5 to 23 shall not press the no confidence notice dated

08.02.2022. He further submits that the ends of justice will be sub-served if

the Collector is also directed to fix the date of hearing within a period of 15

days from the date of receipt of notice.

6. Mr Pradhan submits that since meeting for discussing no confidence

motion had not taken place, there is no bar for the respondent Nos. 5 to 23

to again submit a fresh notice for no confidence motion. He submits that

he will have no objection to dispose of the appeal in the light of the

submission of Mr. Agrawal.

7. Mr. Solapurkar does not oppose the prayer made by Mr. Agrawal.

8. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties,

this Court has not gone into the correctness or otherwise of the order of the

learned Single Judge and has also not considered the argument advanced

by Mr. Pradhan that the meeting has to be fixed by the Collector within a

period of 15 days from the date of receipt of notice, leaving the same to be

decided in an appropriate case, if the occasion so arises. The Collector,

however, will fix the date for the meeting within 15 days from the date of

receipt of a valid notice of no confidence from the respondent Nos. 5 to 23.

9. With the above observations, writ appeal stands disposed of.

                        Sd/-                                          Sd/-
               (Arup Kumar Goswami)                           (Gautam Chourdiya)
                    Chief Justice                                    Judge
Chandra
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter