Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3821 Chatt
Judgement Date : 16 June, 2022
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 542 of 2022
Maggar Singh Boparai S/o Shri Mikka Singh Boparai, Aged About 70 Years R/o L.I.G. -
227, Shahid Bhagat Singh Ward, Tatibandh Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur,
Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
Cholamandalam Investment Finance Company National Corporate Park, Infront Of
Anupam Garden, G.E. Road, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), Through Company Of
General Power Off Attorney Holder - Mahendra Sahu, Aged About 34 Years, S/o - M.R.
Sahu, R/o - G.E. Road, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
16-06-2022 Shri R.K. Agrawal, Advocate for the applicant.
Heard.
Issue notice to the respondent on payment of process fee as per rules.
P.F. be paid within a week.
Also heard on I.A. No. 1/2022, application under Section 389 of the
Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence.
Applicant has preferred this criminal revision against the order dated
05-05-2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur (C.G.) in CRA
No.156/2021.
The applicant has been convicted and sentenced by the Judicial
Magistrate First Class, Raipur vide order dated 13-09-2021 in Criminal
Complaint Case No.1934 of 2014 as under:-
Sr. No. Section Act Jail sentence Fine sentence Default
stipulation
1. 138 Negotiable R.I. for 1 Rs.6,00,000/- S.I. for 1
year
Instrument Act, month.
In Criminal appeal No.156/2021 preferred by the applicant, the learned
Appellate Court/Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur (C.G.), upheld the
conviction of applicant under Section 138 of N.I.A. Act, 1881 and modified the
sentence as under:-
Sr. No. Section Act Jail sentence Fine sentence Default
stipulation
1. 138 Negotiable - Payment of S.I. for 3
Rs.1,15,000/- months.
Instrument fine amount
within 45
Act, 1881 days.
It is submitted that the applicant has been erroneously convicted by the
trial Court and the same has been erroneously upheld by the appellate Court.
He further submitted that, however, the learned appellate Court set aside the
sentence of imprisonment and also reduced the fine amount to Rs.1,15,000/-,
on being poor economic condition of the applicant, he is not able to pay
aforesaid fine amount. He further submitted that the applicant has a good case
on merit, therefore, it is prayed that execution, if any, on the basis of the order of the appellate Court be stayed during the pendency of this revision.
Considered the submission and perused the impugned judgment.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I feel inclined to
allow the I.A. No.1/2022 with condition. Accordingly, application under Section
389 of the Cr.P.C. for suspension of fine sentence is allowed with a condition
that if the applicant deposits 30% of fine amount imposed by the Appellate
Court i.e. Rs.1,15,000/- before the trial Court within a period of one month from
the date of this order, remaining part of fine sentence passed by the appellate
Court shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing, which shall be subject to
confirmation after appearance of the respondent.
Certified copy as per rules. SD/-
(N.K. Chandravanshi)
Judge
Amardeep
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!