Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhartendu Kumar Kamal vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2022 Latest Caselaw 3820 Chatt

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3820 Chatt
Judgement Date : 16 June, 2022

Chattisgarh High Court
Bhartendu Kumar Kamal vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 16 June, 2022
                                     1


                                                                      NAFR
            HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                           WA No. 61 of 2022
 Bhartendu Kumar Kamal S/o Shri Ganesh Ram Kamal, aged about 39
 years, MIG 02, Pushp Vihar Colony, Behind Ravishankar Nagar, Dadar
 Road, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

                                                               ---- Appellant

                                 Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Home,
  Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Panchayat
  and Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District
  Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Inspector General of Police, Raipur Range, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Superintendent of Police Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. Station House Officer, Police Station, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

                                                           ---- Respondents

(Cause Title taken from Case Information System)

For Appellant : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Advocate.

For Respondents : Mr. H.S.Ahluwalia, Deputy Advocate General

Hon'ble Mr. Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge

Judgment on Board

Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice

16/06/2022

Heard Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned counsel, appearing for the

appellant. Also heard Mr. H.S.Ahluwalia, learned Deputy Advocate

General for the respondents.

2. This appeal is preferred against an order dated 07.12.2021

passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(Cr) No. 808 of 2021.

3. The writ petition was filed seeking a direction to the respondents

to comply with the order dated 08.08.2021 passed by the Judicial

Magistrate, First Class, Raipur, on the application filed by the petitioner

under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short,

the CrPC) and to register the First Information Report (for short, the FIR)

and to lodge the final report before the competent Court.

4. Prior to filing of the said writ petition, the petitioner had

approached this Court by filing WP(Cr) No. 545 of 2020. The said petition

came to be disposed of by order dated 06.11.2020 granting liberty to the

petitioner to approach the jurisdictional criminal court either under Section

156(3) or Section 200 of the CrPC.

5. Despite the order dated 09.08.2021 of the jurisdictional

Magistrate directing the Station House Officer, Civil Lines, Raipur to

register an FIR and to carry out the investigation in accordance with the

provisions contained in Chapter XII of the CrPC, no FIR was registered

and it is in that circumstances, the writ petition, out of which the present

appeal is preferred, came to be filed.

6. The learned Single Judge had dismissed the petition holding

that the present petition was not maintainable under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India.

7. During pendency of this appeal, FIR No 0225 of 2022 was

registered on 16.04.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 420

and 468 of the Indian Penal Code.

8. We had required the presence of Mr. Prashant Agrawal,

Superintendent of Police, Raipur alongwith Mr. R.K.Mishra, the officer

who was holding the post of Station House Officer, Civil Lines, Raipur at

the relevant point of time and Mr. Satya Prakash Tiwari, T.I. Civil Lines,

Raipur, to explain why there was delay in registering of the FIR despite

there being an order of the jurisdictional Magistrate.

9. Mr. Thakur, learned counsel, appearing for the appellant

submits that now that the FIR has been registered, having regard to the

prayer made in the writ petition, no further adjudication is called for in this

appeal and the appellant would be satisfied if an observation is made that

in the event the appellant feels that the investigation is not carried out

earnestly, he may be permitted to approach this Court again.

10. Mr. Ahluwalia, learned Deputy Advocate General does not have

any objection to the prayer made by Mr. Thakur.

11. In view of the above submissions, the writ appeal stands

disposed of granting liberty to the appellant to approach this Court again

if investigation is tardy or not conducted in accordance with law.

                      Sd/-                                         Sd/-
             (Arup Kumar Goswami)                          (Parth Prateem Sahu)
                CHIEF JUSTICE                                    JUDGE
Amit
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter