Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4455 Chatt
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
ORDER SHEET
CRA No. 993 of 2021
Maniram Pahadi Korwa S/o Godro @ Godru @ Godaran Aged About 45 Years R/o
Dudhi Tangar, Police Station Balco, Presently At Devpahri Middle School Kanya Shala,
Police Station Lemru, District Korba (Chhattisgarh). ----Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Lemru, District Korba (Chhattisgarh).
---- Respondent
Division Bench:-
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal
13.07.2022 Shri Vivek Shrivastava, counsel for the Appellant.
Shri Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the State/Respondent.
Heard on I.A No.01/2021, an application for suspension of sentence and
grant of bail.
By the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 18.08.2021 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Korba (C.G.) in Session Trial No.48/2020, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:-
Conviction Sentence
U/s 302 of I.P.C. R.I. for life and fine of Rs.500/-, in
default to undergo additional R.I. for
6 months.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellant has been falsely implicated in the matter and he is not involved in the crime in question. He submits further that the Appellant is in jail since 06.09.2020, and therefore, he may be released on bail.
On the other hand, learned state counsel opposes the bail application on the submission that taking into consideration particularly the testimonial statements of Ram Singh Pahadi Korwa (PW-1), Meena (PW-2), Vijay Singh Sarthi (PW-3), Sonkunwar (PW-4) and Geeta Bai (PW-5) and further taking into consideration the memorandum statement (Ex.P-7), Seizure Memo (Ex.P-08 to
10), and F.S.L. Report (Ex.P-27), the present appellant is not entitled to be released on bail.
We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the entire record carefully.
Taking into consideration the submission made by learned counsel for the parties as also considering the material available on record, statements of Ram Singh Pahadi Korwa (PW-1), Meena (PW-2), Vijay Singh Sarthi (PW-3), Sonkunwar (PW-4) and Geeta Bai (PW-5) and further taking into consideration the memorandum statement (Ex.P-7), Seizure Memo (Ex.P-08 to 10), and F.S.L. Report (Ex.P-27), as also considering the fact that the wooden stick was seized from possession of the appellant, which was being used as weapon to commit the offence as also bloodstained was found on the same, we are not inclined to release the Appellant on bail.
Accordingly, I.A No.01 is rejected.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sanjay S. Agrawal)
JUDGE JUDGE
vivek
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!