Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashish Mishra vs Pradeep Agrawal
2022 Latest Caselaw 7238 Chatt

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7238 Chatt
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2022

Chattisgarh High Court
Ashish Mishra vs Pradeep Agrawal on 2 December, 2022
                                    -1-




                                                                        NAFR
          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
                           M.C.C. NO. 636 OF 2022
   Ashish Mishra, S/o. S.N. Mishra, aged about 49 years, R/o 481,
Ward No.41, behind Lucky Bharat Garage, Yadav Gali,
Chuchuhiyapara, Shanker Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                                             ... Applicant
                                  versus
     Pradeep Agrawal, S/o Late Satyanarayan Agrawal, R/o Flat No.
304, 3rd Floor, Mahima Vihar Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.),
presently residing at Mahesh Colony, Gudiyari, Raipur, District Raipur
(C.G.)
                                                     ... Respondent

For Applicant : Mr. N.K. Chatterjee, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board [02/12/2022]

1. The present is a repeat MCC filed by the Applicant.

2. The whole dispute arises out of the Order passed by this High

Court in W.P.(227) No.253/2020 disposed of on 4.3.2020. It was a

case where the Applicant had sought for necessary police protection

for execution of the warrant of arrest against the

Respondent/Judgment Debtor in Civil Execution Case No.55-B/2015.

The High Court had disposed of the said Writ Petition by making the

following observations:-

"3. After considering the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, I am of this view that if the circumstances so permit then the Court has the inherent power to order for police assistance in execution of warrant of arrest in civil cases. Therefore, the petition is disposed off and the application filed by the petitioner for seeking police help is allowed. Learned Court below is directed to provide the police help for execution of warrant of arrest in accordance with the rules that are provided in Civil Court Rules and Orders."

3. Subsequently, an MCC was filed by the Applicant, i.e., MCC

No.390/2020 which again came up for hearing before this High Court

on 14.8.2020 whereby the earlier Order passed in the aforesaid Writ

Petition stood modified to the extent that the Execution Court was

directed to make all endevours to conclude the execution proceedings

within six months from the date when the normal functioning of the

Subordinate Courts stands restored.

4. It is necessary to mention that the normal functioning of the

Subordinate Courts during the relevant period was hampered because

of the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown that followed thereafter.

5. Since the said proceedings could not be concluded within the six

months' time, as ordered, there was yet another MCC i.e., MCC

No.298/2022, filed by the Applicant based upon the letter received

from the Eight Additional District Judge, Bilaspur seeking for extension

of time. The said MCC also stood allowed and the extension was

granted for further six months' time to conclude the proceedings.

6. In spite of the further six months' time granted, the VIII

Additional District Judge, Bilaspur could not get the Order executed

and the extended six months' period is also now coming to end. This

has again forced the Applicant to file the present MCC seeking for

further extension of time.

7. The second extension of time sought for by the Applicant is

totally uncalled for. The execution proceedings are not getting

deferred or delayed because of the fault of the Applicant. If, at all,

there was any extension of time required, it was for the concerned

Additional District Judge considering the execution case to have made

an appropriate correspondence seeking for extension of time.

8. For the said reasons, this Court is not inclined to entertain the

present MCC, leaving it open for the concerned Additional District

Judge to take appropriate steps showing the bona fides for not

concluding the execution proceedings within the stipulated period.

9. The original Order passed by the Writ Court was passed on

4.3.2020. The execution proceedings were in-fact initiated as early as

in 2015 and in between seven years' time has lapsed. The Execution

Court should not reflect the helplessness in getting the Order

executed. The Court while disposing of the said MCC had made it

very clear that all endevours should be made for getting the Order

executed at the earliest.

10. Without further commenting, the present MCC at the stage

stands disposed of.

Sd/-

                                                               (P. Sam Koshy)
/sharad/                                                            Judge
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter