Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2103 Chatt
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2021
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRA No. 921 of 2021
1. Sharad Kumar, S/o Jeet Ram Chandra, Aged about 30 years,
2. Yogendra Kumar, S/o Santosh Chandra, Aged about 26 years,
3. Liladhar, S/o Jeetram Chandra, Aged about 37 years,
4. Tuleshwar, S/o Kawal Das Chandra, Aged about 44 years,
5. Chhotelal, S/o Bhurawaram, Aged about 45 years,
6. Budheshwar Chandra, S/o Karan Singh, Aged about 38 Years,
7. Ajambar Prasad, S/o Santosh Chandra, Aged about 31 years,
8. Baliram, S/o Shardaram, Aged about 31 years,
9. Tejlal, S/o Karan Singh, Aged about 29 years,
10. Santosh Chandra, S/o Pritam Chandra, Aged about 60 years,
11. Shiv Prasad @ Bitki, S/o Dwarika Chandra, Aged about 30 years,
12. Mithlesh, S/o Sukhilal Chandra, Aged about 39 years,
13. Tarachand, S/o Sukhdev Chandra, Aged about 30 years,
14. Yaadram, S/o Santosh Kumar, Aged about 24 years,
All appellants are R/o- Village Dhobnipali, P.S. Dabhra, Civil & Revenue District-
Janjgir-Champa (C.G.).
---- Appellants
Versus
• State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Station House Officer, P.S.- Dabhra, Distrct
Janjgir-Champa (C.G.).
---- Respondent
02/09/2021 Mr. Ishwar Jaiswal, counsel for the Appellants.
Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, G.A. for the State/Respondent.
Heard on admission.
Admit.
Call for the record of the Court below.
Also heard I.A. No. 01/2021, application for suspension of
sentence and grant of bail to the appellants.
By the impugned judgment dated 17.08.2021 passed in
Sessions Trial No. 41/2015 by the learned First Additional Sessions
Judge, Sakti, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) the appellants stands
convicted as mentioned below:
Conviction Sentence In Default
U/s 186 of IPC RI for 03 months with In default of payment
a fine amount of of fine amount
Rs.500/- additional RI for 01
month.
U/s 147/149 of IPC RI for 02 years with a In default of payment
fine amount of of fine amount
Rs.2,000/- additional RI for 03
months.
U/s 148/149 of IPC RI for 03 years with a In default of payment
fine amount of Rs. of fine amount
3,000/- additional RI for 06
months.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants
have been wrongly convicted by the trial Court in the judgment
without there being any sufficient evidence available on record. He
further submits that the appellants were on bail during trial and after
the judgment of the trial Court they were granted temporary bail. Hence, it is prayed that their application be allowed.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has opposed
the bail application and submissions made in this respect.
Heard both the parties and perused the record of the trial
Court.
After perusing the impugned judgment and considering this
fact that the appellants were on bail during the pendency of trial and
have not misused the liberty, for these reasons, I am of this opinion
that it will be proper to release the appellants on bail during the
pendency of this appeal.
Execution of substantive jail sentences imposed upon the
appellants shall remain suspended during the pendency of this
appeal and they shall be released on bail on executing a personal
bond for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- each with one solvent surety for the
like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court for their appearance
before the Registry of this Court on 20.12.2021. They shall thereafter
appear before the trial Court on a date to be given by the Registry of
this Court and shall continue to appear there on all such subsequent
dates as are given to them by the said Court, till the disposal of this
appeal.
List this case for final hearing in its due course.
Sd/-
(Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Vasant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!