Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3200 Chatt
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2021
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
W.P.(C) No. 1003 of 2020
Prashant Kumar Chandel, S/o. Shri P.S. Chandel, aged about 50 years, R/o. HIG -
50, Arya Colony, Tifra, Thana - Sirigitti, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Arya Grih Nirman Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, MIG/7, Arya Colony, Tifra,
Bilaspur (C.G.) Through Its President, Smt. Kanta Sinha Wd/o Late Shri S.C.
Sinha, Aged About 64 Years, At Present R/o Neharu Nagar, Bilaspur, District
- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
Note - The Above Instant Samiti Has Dissolved By The Dy. Registrar,
Therefore In Charge By Dy. Registrar Co - Operative Society Old Composite
Building, Opposite Collectorate Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
2. Housing And Urban Development Corpn. Ltd., Paryavas Bhawan, Jail Road,
Bhopal (M P) Having Its Registered Office At H U D C O House, Lodhi Road,
New Delhi - 110003.
3. The Debt Recovery Tribunal, Shanti Kunj, 797- I I, South Civil Lines, Jabalpur
(M.P.) Through Its Registrar.
4. The Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Shanti Kunj, 797 - I I South
Civil Lines, Jabalpur (M.P.).
5. The Chhattisgarh State Co- Operative Tribunal, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur
Chhattisgarh.
6. The Registrar, Co- Operative Societies, Raipur Chhattisgarh.
7. The Deputy Registrar, Co - Operative Societies, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
8. Housing And Urban Development Corporation, Through - Its Authorized
Representative, B V V S N Murthy Patnaik, A G M Law, Having It Regional
Office At 1-B, Surya Apartment Katora Talab, Raipur Chhattisgarh.
9. Neelam Choudhary W/o Late Shri Rajendra Choudhary, Aged About 45
Years R/o C/o Gurjeet Singh Dhanoa Quarter No. H I G - 48, Arya Colony,
Tifra, Police Station Sirgitti, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
10. Vijay Kumar Choudhary S/o Late Rajendra Choudhary, Aged About 25 Years
R/o C/o Gurjeet Singh Dhanoa Quarter No. H I G-48, Arya Colony, Tifra,
Police Station Sirgitti, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
Mr. Bharat Rajput, counsel for the petitioner. 17/11/2021 Heard.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the
petitioner was not a party in personal capacity in the case, before the
DRT, Jabalpur on which the judgment dated 05.07.2002 was passed.
The petitioner had challenged the recovery proceeding, before the
respondent No.7 in the case No. 78/64/2013. The order dated
20.02.2013 has been passed in which the petitioner has been
exonerated from responsibility and the respondent No.1 society has
been held responsible for the recovery proceeding. In the original case
before DRT, Jabalpur respondent No.1 is the only party, who has
been held responsible for recovery. Notice has been issued to the
petitioner in person directing him to vacate the property in his
possession on 22.10.2021. Hence, this petition.
Issue notice to the respondents. Process fee as per rules.
List this case after four weeks.
In the meanwhile, it is ordered that the action taken against the
petitioner on the notice dated 22.10.2021 by the Recovery Officer,
shall remain stayed, until the next date of hearing.
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
balram
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!