Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Banshilal vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2021 Latest Caselaw 3806 Chatt

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3806 Chatt
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2021

Chattisgarh High Court
Banshilal vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 20 December, 2021
                                        1


                                                                           NAFR

                HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                WPS No. 6965 of 2021

     • Banshilal S/o Dharmuram Boga, Aged About 44 Years R/o House No. H-
       8, Kanshiram Nagar, Sector-1, Police Station Telibandha Raipur District
       Raipur Chhattisgarh

                                                                   ---- Petitioner

                                     Versus

     1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home,
        Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh

     2. Commandant 4th Battalion Chhattisgarh Armed Force, Mana- Raipur
        Chhattisgarh

     3. Assistant Commandant / Enquiry Officer, D Company, 4th Battalion,
        Mana- Raipur Chhattisgarh

                                                               ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Shri Varun Sharma, Advocate For State : Shri Jitendra Pali, Dy.A.G.

S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order On Board

20/12/2021

Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner, who is

a Constable, has suffered suspension w.e.f. 02/05/2020 and departmental

enquiry is also going on but till date it has not been continued, therefore, the

suspension ought to have been revoked in view of judgment of the Supreme

Court in the case of Ajay Kumar Chaudhary v. Union of India and ors.

(2015) 7 SCC 291 for which, he may be allowed to make representation to

respondent No.2 / Commandant, 4th Battalion, Chhattisgarh Armed Force.

2. Learned State counsel would submit that the petitioner make

representation to respondent No.2 for revocation of suspension which would be

considered in accordance with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the

case of Ajay Kumar Chaudhary (supra) within a reasonable period and

expeditiously.

3. Be that as it may, petitioner may make representation before respondent

No.2 within 2 weeks from today which shall be considered and decided by

respondent No.2 on its own merits by a reasoned and speaking order within 45

days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid observation, this petition is finally disposed off.

Sd/-

( Sanjay K. Agrawal ) Judge Deepti

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter