Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sukhendra Kewat vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2021 Latest Caselaw 3662 Chatt

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3662 Chatt
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2021

Chattisgarh High Court
Sukhendra Kewat vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 13 December, 2021
                                           1

                                                                                 NAFR

                  HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                               MCRC No. 7489 of 2021

    Sukhendra Kewat S/o Dilharan Kewat Aged About 35 Years R/o Devrikhurd, P.
     S. Torwa, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

                                                                          ---- Applicant

                                       Versus

    State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, P. S. Sirgitti, District
     Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

                                                                      ---- Respondent

For Applicant : Shri Shantam Awasthi, Advocate

For Respondents/State : Shri Animesh Tiwari, Dy. AG

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

Order

13/12/2021

1. Heard.

2. This is the First Bail Application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested on

06.09.2021 in connection with Crime No.482/2021 registered at Police Station

Sirgitti, District Bilaspur (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 21 & 22

of N.D.P.S. Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, 07.09.2021 on an information received a raid was

conducted and from the applicant 36 units of 100 ml bottles of prohibited syrup

with codeine were seized. Thereby the offence has been committed.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is running a

medical shop in the city and the content of the narcotic substance is much less

if it is separately considered. He relied on the judgment passed by the Delhi

High Court in the case of Iqbal Singh Versus State (Bail Appl N.645/2020)

and submits that no further seizure is needed, therefore, the applicant may be

released on bail.

5. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

6. Considering the quantity of seizure made which contains 100 ml bottles and

also taking into that no further seizure is required to be made and prima facie

taking into the dictum laid down by the Delhi High Court supra, I am inclined to

release the applicant on bail.

7. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be

released on bail on his executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.25,000/- with

one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to

appear before the trial Court on each and every date given by the said Court.

SD/-

Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter