Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3576 Chatt
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2021
T O HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
SA No. 153 of 2021
Keshav Prasad Sahu Versus Natthulal Sahu
SA/250/2020,
08.12.2021 Mr. Yogendra Chaturvedi, Counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Aditya Sharma, P. L. for the State.
Mr. R. R. Soni, Counsel for respondents No. 7 and 8.
Mr. Faiz Kazi, Counsel for respective respondent.
The appellant has filed present second appeal aggrieved with the
judgment and decree passed by First Appellate Court wherein the
judgment and decree passed by the trial Court has been modified
adversely affecting the right of present appellant, therefore, he has filed
second appeal. It was objected by learned counsel for other respondents,
that the second appeal is not maintainable.
When this question posed to the learned counsel for the appellant
then learned Senior counsel Mr. Prafull Bharat assist this Court and
would submit that since his right has been adversely affected by First
Appellate Court, therefore, he may be called as aggrieved person as he
was satisfied with the judgment and decree passed by trial Court which
was adversely changed by First Appellate Court to the interest of the
present appellant, therefore, second appeal is maintainable.
The objection raised by learned counsel for respondent is rejected
now the appeal will be listed on admission.
After hearing for a long time when a specific question put on
perversity recorded by the First Appellate Court, learned counsel for the appellant seeks two weeks time to go through with the evidence recorded
before the trial Court to establish the perversity.
List this case in the 1st week of January, 2022.
Interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date of
hearing.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge
parul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!