Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3451 Chatt
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2021
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
FA No. 42 of 2021
Parmeshwar Sahu & another -Versus- Bihari & others
02/12/2021 Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal along with Mr. Vivek Kumar
Shrivastava, Advocates for the appellants.
Mr. Ravi Kumar Banjare, Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 3.
Ms. Sareena Khan, Advocate for the respondent No.10.
Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, P.L. for the State/respondent No.11.
The other respondents No. 4 to 9 though served, but not
represented.
Heard on I.A. No.1 which is an application under Order 39 Rule 1 &
2 R/w. Section 151 of CPC filed by the appellants herein.
Counsel for the appellants submits that their suit for specific
performance has been rejected only on the ground that the agreement
between the parties was not complete and unenforcible.
Counsel for the appellants refers to the judgment of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of 'ALOKA BOSE v. PARMATMA DEVI &
OTHERS' (2009) 2 SCC 582, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has
taken a view that an agreement which has the signature of the vendor alone would be an enforcible agreement.
Given the said facts and circumstances of the case and the judgment
of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we are of the considered opinion that strong
case for allowing I.A. No.1 has been made out. Accordingly, I.A. No.1 as of
now stands allowed.
The respondents are restrained from creating any third party interest
on the suit property until further order from this Court.
Sd/- Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy) (Rajani Dubey)
Judge Judge
Ved
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!