Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Srei Equipment Finance Limited vs Sai Logistics And Anr
2026 Latest Caselaw 2514 Cal/2

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2514 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Srei Equipment Finance Limited vs Sai Logistics And Anr on 31 March, 2026

    ORDER                                                          OCD - 24
                       IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                           COMMERCIAL DIVISION
                               ORIGINAL SIDE

                             AP-COM/1002/2025
                      SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED
                                     VS
                           SAI LOGISTICS AND ANR

BEFORE
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
Date: March 31, 2026.
                                                                        Appearance:-
                                                           Mr. Swatarup Banerjee, Adv.
                                                                Mr. Sariful Haque, Adv.
                                                      Mr. Subhankar Chakraborty, Adv.
                                                                Ms. Harshita Nath, Adv.


      The Court:- The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an Arbitral

Tribunal comprising of a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the

parties.


      This Court vide order dated 3rd February, 2026 had directed substituted

service upon the respondents.      Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed

affidavit of service, wherein service through publication has been effected upon

the respondents. Despite the same, none appears on behalf of the

respondents.

Affidavit of service is taken on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.1

availed financial assistance from the petitioner to the tune of 20,00,00,000 /-

under a Loan Agreement dated 01.07.2019 bearing agreement No.178537. It is

further submitted that on behalf of the respondent No. 1, the respondent No. 2

executed a Corporate Guarantee dated 01.07.2019. Both these agreements are

independent and yet form part of the same transaction. It is submitted that

the respondents committed defaults in adhering to the payment schedule as

agreed between the parties.

In view thereof, the petitioner vide letter dated 04.07.2022 terminated the

said Loan Agreement dated 01.07.2019 and demanded Rs.35,03,71,605/- as

on 04.07.2022. Despite receipt of the said notice, the respondents failed to

liquidate the outstanding amount.

It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the

arbitration clause being clause No.23 is contained in the Loan Agreement dated

01.07.2019. The petitioner issued a notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration

and Conciliation Act, 1996 on 11.07.2025. Despite the receipt of the said

notice, the respondents failed to respond or liquidate the loan taken from the

petitioner.

In the aforesaid circumstance, the petitioner has sought appointment of

a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The disputes

between the parties arise out of the alleged default in repayment of the loan

amount. The notice invoking arbitration was issued on 11.07.2025. Prima

facie, it appears that disputes have arisen between the parties in terms of the

Loan Agreement dated 01.07.2019 which contains an arbitration clause

therein. The jurisdiction of this Court is also attracted in terms of the said

clause as mentioned by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Thus, this Court

is satisfied that the present case is a fit case for reference to arbitration.

Accordingly, this Court appoints Ms. Justice Samapti Chatterjee

(Retired), (Mob. No. 8335073596) as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the

disputes between the parties.

All questions relating to arbitrability of the dispute, admissibility of the

claims, limitation and other issues are kept open to be urged before the learned

sole Arbitrator.

The appointment of the learned sole Arbitrator shall be subject to

compliance with Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The learned sole Arbitrator shall be entitled to fix the remuneration in

accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Act.

A copy of this order shall be communicated by the petitioner to the

learned sole Arbitrator for necessary action.

With the aforesaid directions, the present petition stands disposed of.

(GAURANG KANTH, J.)

R. D. Barua

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter