Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2071 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2026
OD-02 & 03
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE
WPO/868/2025 Swastik Projects Pirvate Limited & Anr.
Versus Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
And WPO/3/2026 Swastik Projects Pirvate Limited & Anr.
Versus Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Before:
The Hon'ble Justice RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY Date: 19th March 2026
Appearance:
Ms. Ujjaini Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. Sujit Banerjee, Advocate Ms. Ritaja Mukherjee, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee, Advocate Ms. Manisha Nath, Advocate Ms. Susmita Chatterjee, Advocate for the KMC Ms. Deboleena Ghosh, Advocate for the Ld. AG
The Court: 1. It appears that in the appearance of the parties in
the order dated 4th February 2026, the name of the petitioners' Advocate
viz. 'Ms. Ujjaini Chatterjee' has been incorrectly recorded as 'Ms. Ujjaini
Mukherjee'. Let the same be corrected. The other portion of the said
order shall remain unaltered.
2. Ms. Ujjaini Chattjeree, learned Advocate representing the
petitioners would submit that the petitioners without prejudice to their
rights in the writ petition are interested to deposit the entire amount on
account of property tax on the basis of the computation made by the
municipal authorities for the period from first quarter 2019-18 to the
fourth quarter 2025-26, which according to her, aggregates to
Rs.5,72,966/-.
3. Mr. Mukherjee, learned Advocate representing the
Corporation would submit that the Corporation is never averse to accept
the rates and taxes, if the petitioners are ready and willing to deposit the
same, be it without prejudice to their rights, such payment is always
welcome.
4. Having regard to the above, leave is granted to the petitioners
to deposit the property tax as may be found due in respect of the
assessee no.1100078 for the period noted hereinabove. Such payment
shall be made without prejudice to their rights in the present writ
petition.
5. It is made clear that in the event the petitioners succeed in
the writ petition, the petitioners may be entitled to the aforesaid sum
alongwith the interest as this Court may think it fit. It is also made clear
that in the event the aforesaid deposit is made, there shall be no
impediment for the municipal authorities to consider the petitioners'
amalgamation application in accordance with law.
5. List this matter for further consideration in the monthly list of
May, 2026.
(RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.)
R. Bose
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!