Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3050 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2026
OD-5
WPO/151/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
INDRANIL ROY
-VERSUS-
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE
CORPORATION AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Date : 16th April, 2026.
Appearance:
Mr. Debapriya Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Bhaskar Duttagupta, Adv.
Ms. Sona Khatoon, Adv.
...for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandipan Banerjee, Adv.
...for the Durgapur Municipal Corpn.
Mr. Shiv Shankar Banerjee, Adv.
Ms. Sretapa Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Chamria, Adv.
...for ESIC.
Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Adv.
Mr. Somnath Naskar, Adv.
...for the respondent no.5.
The Court: Learned Advocate appearing for the respondent/ESIC has
filed documents in support of their contention that all notices and orders including
an order under Section 45A of the ESI Act passed on 27 th March, 2025 have been
served upon the petitioner herein and the petitioner, without preferring an appeal,
has approached this Court by stating that no order under Section 45A of the Act
was served upon the petitioner and, as such, having got knowledge for the first time
on receiving the necessary notice dated 20 th February, 2026, the petitioner has
approached this Court.
It is the contention of the petitioner herein that he is a contractor holding
a certificate of enlistment as civil contractor etc. along with PF and ESI
registration. The petitioner was engaged by the Durgapur Municipal Corporation
and executed work by employing hired contract labourers. It is stated that after
completion of the work the petitioner has paid all wages, bonus and statutory dues
to the hired contract labourers in full and final settlement. But the respondent/ESI
has made a claim for dues for the period as mentioned in the impugned order. The
petitioner has approached this Court after the notice of the Recovery Officer was
served upon the petitioner. It is stated by the petitioner that he has made payment
of ESI dues till termination of the contract under the Durgapur Municipal
Corporation in November, 2014 and dues in the impugned notice is from September,
2019 to March, 2024.
It appears that the petitioner has replied to the said notice dated 4 th
November, 2024. From the writ application it appears that the petitioner has not
mentioned about any order under Section 45A of the ESI Act. The respondent has
produced an order under Section 45A of the ESI Act dated 27 th March, 2025 and the
track report showing due service of the order upon the petitioner herein.
The impugned order being appealable, the petitioner without preferring
an appeal, has approached this Court by suppressing that he has received the order
under Section 45A of the ESI Act.
Accordingly, WPO/151/2026 having no merit, stands dismissed.
(SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.) A.Sadhukhan
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!