Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3206 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 27 November, 2025
OD-11
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURSIDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
EC/287/2011
IA NO: GA/3/2023, GA/4/2024
MPMC PVT. LTD.
VS
CANARA BANK
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
Date : 27TH November, 2025.
Appearance:
Ms. Farhan Ghaffar, Adv.
Ms. S. Bhattacharya, Adv.
Md. Zafar Jihani, Adv.
For the petitioner
Ms. A. Ghosh, Adv.
Mr. S. Ghosh, Adv.
For the judgment debtor
The Court:- The dispute between the parties, lingering for a considerable
period of time has culminated into the liability on the part of the Kolkata
Municipal Corporation to disburse a sum of Rs. 67,50,000/- in favour of the
plaintiff/petitioner vide an order of the Division Bench of this Court dated 7 th
November, 2025.
The aforesaid order, inter alia, stated as follows:
"15. Be that as it may, since the appellant paid KMC authorities
the municipal tax and surcharge in terms of the terms of
settlement, we are of the view that, on the date when the order
impugned was passed there was no liability on the part of the
appellant to the respondent to be discharged and for the
executing Court to pass the order impugned. In our
understanding, clause 3 of the terms of settlement although foist
the liability of the municipal tax and surcharge on the appellant
before us, for the period from April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010, it
does not provide that such payment is to be made by the
appellant to the respondent in the first place and that, the
respondent can claim reimbursement from the appellant.
16. Again, subsequent to the terms of settlement there is an order
passed by the writ Court dated June 30, 2022 in presence of
both 2025:CHC-OS:219-DB 6 the parties which permitted the
appellant before us to pay municipal tax and surcharge to KMC
authorities directly.
17. Appellant before us having paid the KMC the municipal tax
and surcharge, we are of the view that interest of justice would
be subserved by setting aside the order impugned and permitting
the respondent before us to seek reimbursement of the sum of
Rs.67,50,000/- from the KMC authorities.
18. APO/106/2024 along with all pending applications are
disposed of without any order as to costs.
19. Since we disposed of the appeal, the interim order requiring
the appellant to keep a sum of Rs.67,50,000/- in a fixed deposit,
stands vacated. Needless to say that the appellant is at liberty to
encash the fixed deposit."
The plaintiff/petitioners in view of the aforesaid directions in the order is
to seek disbursement of a sum of Rs. 67,50,000/- from the KMC authorities
placing before the same a copy of the order passed by the Hon'ble Division
Bench as well as a copy of the order passed by this Court within seven days of
passing of this order through an appropriate communication and the KMC
authorities are to comply with the same within four weeks from the date of
such communication.
EC/287/2011 along with the applications being GA/3/2023 and
GA/4/2024 are disposed of accordingly.
(ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, J.)
A Dey
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!