Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1478 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2025
OCD-6
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
(Commercial Division)
ORIGINAL SIDE
EC-COM/106/2025
ASHOK JARIA
VS
M/S SENCO JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED
BEFORE:
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Date: 21st March, 2025.
Appearance:
Mr. Sunil Kumar Singhania, Adv.
Ms. Kalpana Singhania, Adv.
. ...for the decree holder.
1.
In course of hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the decree
holder, at the very outset, draws the attention of this Court to the
certified copy of the decree as has been filed in connection with the
instant execution case.
2. It is submitted that since even after filing of the instant execution case,
the judgment debtor has not paid the decretal amount including the
accrued interest thereon, the Directors of the judgment debtor,
particulars of whom have been mentioned in clause (b) of column no. 10
of the Tabular Statement of the instant execution case, be directed to file
an affidavit of assets before this Court.
3. It is further submitted that the decree holder has every apprehension
that in order to frustrate the decree, the judgment debtor may dispose of
the properties as belonging to him, particulars of which have been given
at paragraph no. 13 of the affidavit.
4. On careful consideration of the entire materials as placed before this
Court, it appears to this Court that no material is forthcoming before
this Court that the judgment debtor has made any attempt to pay off the
decretal dues.
5. In view of such, the Directors of the judgment debtors namely, (i) Mr.
Sumitendra Chandra Sen, (ii) Mr. Jiban Kumar Sen and (iii) Ms. Atima
Sen are hereby directed to file their affidavits of assets on the adjourned
date. The said Directors are further directed to be present in person
before this Court on the adjourned date.
6. Considering the apprehension of the decree holder and on careful
consideration of the entire materials placed before this Court, this Court
is of the considered view that the decree holder has successfully made a
prima facie case for obtaining an order of injunction as prayed for.
7. It further appears to this Court that so far as the balance of convenience
and inconvenience is concerned, the balance of convenience is in favour
of the decree holder and in the event injunction as prayed is not granted,
the decree holder may suffer irreparable loss and injury.
8. In view of such, let there be an order of ad-interim injunction upon the
judgment debtor from disposing and/or alienating and/or creating any
third party interest at their shop at 168, B. B Ganguly Street, P.S-
Bowbazar, Kolkata-700012 till disposal of the instant execution
application or until further order whichever is earlier.
9. Let the matter appear on 25th April, 2025 under the same heading.
10. The decree holder is directed to communicate the server copy of this
order to the judgment debtor as well as upon the aforementioned
Directors of the judgment debtors by speed post and to file affidavit of
service on the adjourned date.
(PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)
JM/S. A. AR (CR)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!