Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4726 Cal
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2024
13.09.2024.
31.
Ct. No.237
Bd. CRR 3930 of 2015
With
I.A. No.CRAN 1 of 2016
(Old No. CRAN 100 of 2016)
CRAN 3 of 2024
Rajarshi Sengupta
-vs-
Anamika Ray
Mr. Anirban Dutta
Mr. Debabrata Das
Mr. Pradyot Kumar Das
Mr. Saptarshi Mukherjee .....for the petitioner.
Mr. Kartik Kumar Roy
Mr. Debashis Banerjee
Mr. Rakesh Jana ... for the opposite party
RE : CRAN 3 of 2024
Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on
record.
It is submitted on behalf of both the parties that the
dispute between the parties was referred to Calcutta High
Court Mediation Centre and the dispute has been settled by
way of mediation and to that extent final report has also
been submitted which is annexed at page 13 of the
application. It further appears that in terms of amicable
settlement arrived at due to said mediation the parties have
decided not to proceed with the present application being
CRR 3930 of 2015 where the petitioner has prayed for
quashing of the Miscellaneous Case No. 14 of 2011
corresponding to T.R.Case No. 88 of 2011 where the court
below while passing the judgment directed the petitioner to
pay maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure @ Rs. 25,000/- per month from the date of
passing of the order.
Mr. Roy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
opposite party on instruction submits that his client does
not want to proceed with the present application and his
client has got no objection if the judgment passed in
Miscellaneous Case No. 14 of 2011 corresponding to
T.R.Case No. 88 of 2011 passed by learned 2nd Judicial
Magistrate at Alipore, 24 Parganas, is quashed in terms of
the amicable settlement arrived at.
In such view of the matter, and also in view of amicable
settlement in terms of the mediators report, the judgment
passed by 2nd Judicial Magistrate at Alipore in
Miscellaneous Case No. 14 of 2011 corresponding to T.R.
Case No. 88 of 2011 dated 3rd October, 2015 is hereby
quashed.
CRR 3930 of 2015 is disposed of accordingly interms of
amicable settlement.
In view of disposal of the main application, connected
applications are accordingly disposed of.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied
for, be given to the parties upon compliance of usual
undertakings.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!