Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Coal India Ltd.) vs Smt. Purnima Singh & Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 4723 Cal

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4723 Cal
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2024

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Coal India Ltd.) vs Smt. Purnima Singh & Ors on 13 September, 2024

Author: Debangsu Basak

Bench: Debangsu Basak

                     13.09.2024
                     Item No.8
                     Daily List
                     Ct. No.26
                     CHC
                                                      RVW 260 of 2024

                                     M/s. Eastern Coalfield Limited (a subsidiary of
                                                    Coal India Ltd.)
                                                         Vs.
                                             Smt. Purnima Singh & ors.
                                                          in
                                                 MAT 2151 of 2023
                                           M/s Eastern Coalfield Limited
                                                         Vs.
                                             Smt. Purnima Singh & ors.

                                    Mr. Shankar Prasad Dalapati, Advocate
                                    Mr. Pritam Choudhury, Advocate
                                    Mrs. Priti Banerjee
                                                          ...for the review applicant

                                    Mr. Partha Ghosh, Advocate
                                    Mr. Amal Kumar Datta, Advocate
                                    Ms. Simran Sureka, Advocate
                                    Mr. Debashis Das, Advocate
                                                     ...for the writ petitioner/
                                                      respondent

1. Affidavit-of-service filed in Court be taken

on record.

2. Review is at the behest of the appellant in

respect of the judgment and order dated August 7,

2024.

3. By consent of the parties the review is

taken up for final hearing.

4. Learned advocate appearing for the

appellant submits that, learned advocate who

conducted the appeal went beyond his instructions in

conducting the appeal. He submits that, rate of

interest awarded by the judgment and order under

review at the rate of 18 per cent per annum should

Signed By :

CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY High Court of Calcutta 17 th of September 2024 05:17:45 PM

not create a precedence as it will adversely affect the

appellant. Similar matters are pending in different

Courts. He also points out that since, the officers of

the appellant were not at fault, and the appellant

exceeded his instructions, therefore, direction

contained in paragraph-30 requiring the costs

imposed to be recovered from the officers concerned,

should be revisited. Moreover, the quantum of costs

imposed should also be revisited.

5. Learned advocate for the private

respondent submits that, he is unable to give any

consent for reducing the rate of interest as prayed for

on behalf of the appellant. He submits that, there is

no error on the face of the record so far as imposition

of the rate of interest is concerned.

6. Two appeals were filed at the behest of

the appellant. The last order of the learned Single

Judge awarded interest at the rate of 6 per cent per

annum in respect of compassionate appointment.

7. We considered the rival contentions of the

parties argued before us in the appeal. We gave our

reasons for enhancing the rate of interest awarded by

the learned Single Judge at the rate of 6 per cent to

18 per cent per annum.

8. Primarily we found the conduct of the

appellant as an Article 12 authority in dealing with

compassionate appointments inacceptable and

Signed By :

CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY High Court of Calcutta 17 th of September 2024 05:17:45 PM

therefore increased the rate of interest and directed

such rate of interest to be realised from the officers

concerned. We also imposed costs in view of such

conduct of the appellant.

9. In course of hearing, we are informed

that, the process to pay the private respondent was

initiated prior to the appeal attained finality.

Moreover, the instructions of the officers of the

appellant given to the then advocate conducting case

of the appellant were not carried out fully.

10. Such being the situation, we deem it

appropriate to modify the direction contained in

paragraph 30 of the order under review that, the

appellant will realize the interest component from the

persons responsible of the appellant concerned.

11. We also recall the cost awarded by us in

paragraph-34 of the judgment and order under

review. Consequently, paragraph-35 of the judgment

and order under review is also recalled.

12. We are informed that, the appellants

paid the cost awarded by the learned Single Judge.

Such cost awarded by the learned Single Judge be

construed as costs for the conduct of the appellant in

the appeal also.

13. All other portions of the of the judgment

and order under review will remain the same.

Signed By :

CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY High Court of Calcutta 17 th of September 2024 05:17:45 PM

14. RVW 260 of 2024 is disposed of

accordingly.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)

Signed By :

CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY High Court of Calcutta 17 th of September 2024 05:17:45 PM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter