Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sayrul Molla & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 4603 Cal

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4603 Cal
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2024

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Sayrul Molla & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 9 September, 2024

Author: Amrita Sinha

Bench: Amrita Sinha

09.09.2024
Ct. No. 14
 Sl. No.24
   KB
                        In The High Court at Calcutta
                       Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                               Appellate Side

                            W.P.A. No.18895 of 2024

                             Sayrul Molla & Ors.
                                  -versus-
                        The State of West Bengal & Ors.

                       Mr. Subir Sanyal
                       Mr. Chittopriya Ghosh
                       Mr. Somesh Ghosh
                       Mr. Sagnik Roy Chowdhury
                                          ... For the petitioners.

                       Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya
                       Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya
                                     ... For the DPSC, 24 Pgs.(S).

                       Mr. Swapan Kumar Dutta, Ld. AGP
                       Mr. Rajat Dutta
                                     ... For the State.

                       Mr. Ratul Biswas
                       Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury
                                     ... For WBBPE.

                   The petitioners are primary school teachers

             possessing B.Ed. degree. They participated in the

             recruitment process initiated by the North 24 Parganas

             District Primary School Council in the year 2009 and

             were issued letter of appointment in the year 2021.

                   The appointment notice published by the Council

             on 23rd April, 2010 for appointment as primary school

             teacher   prescribed   the   minimum   qualification   of

             passing Madhyamik Examination of the West Bengal

             Board of Secondary Education or its equivalent.
                        2




      With the promulgation of the Right to Education

Act, 2009 the National Council of Teacher Education

(NCTE) mandated the teachers to obtain regular two

years Diploma in Elementary Education training as

compulsory qualification for teaching in the Primary

Schools.

      The dispute whether B.Ed can be treated as a

valid qualification for teachers at primary level cropped

up before various courts throughout the country and

the matter ultimately travelled up to the Hon'ble

Supreme Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court by its

parent     order   dated    11th   August,   2023    in     C.A.

No.5068/2023 in the matter of Devesh Sharma -vs-

Union of India & Ors. held that D.El.Ed is the

qualification for teaching in primary schools.

      By a clarificatory order passed on 8th April, 2024

in Miscellaneous Application Diary No.4303/2024

arising out of final judgment and order dated 11-08-

2023 passed order that the candidates having B.Ed.

qualification will have to undergo a bridge course and

the educational authorities were directed to device

such course which would be applicable for each State

and Union Territory within a period of one year from

the date of the order. The course shall be designed only

for appointees engaged with B.Ed. Degree. NCTE was

directed    to     design   such    course   under        overall
                        3




supervision of the Ministry of Education, Union of

India.

         The petitioners, being B.Ed degree holders,

teaching in primary schools intend to undergo the six

months bridge course.

         The District Primary School Council, North 24

Parganas vide notice dated 5 th April, 2024 requested all

the Sub Inspector of Schools to prepare a chart

containing the details of the untrained teachers,

however,      excluding    the   teachers   having    B.Ed.

qualification.

         The petitioners contend that the notice of the

Council implies that candidates possessing            B.Ed

degree have been considered as trained teachers and,

as such, they have been left out of the ambit of training

meant to be imparted to teachers who do not have any

training at all.

         The petitioners argue that because of the B.Ed

qualification that they possess, they are liable to be

treated as trained ones. The petitioners, however, seek

permission to undergo the six months bridge course.

         The petitioners also seek 'A' category scale of pay

relying on the decision passed by the Hon'ble Division

Bench in MAT 1038 of 2024 with CAN 1 of 2024,

CAN 2 of 2024 and CAN 3 of 2024 (Waliur

Rahaman & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal &

Ors.) wherein the Court was considering an issue as to
                         4




whether the candidates who did not undergo six

months bridge course would be entitled to 'A' category

scale of pay or not.

       The Court considered the report which revealed

that huge number of teachers who do not possess the

six months bridge course training were already getting

'A' category scale of pay.

       Under such facts and circumstances the Court

passed order that the teachers possessing B.Ed

qualification who did not undergo the six months

bridge course shall be provided 'A' category scale of pay

in the same manner as provided to teachers possessing

D.El.Ed qualification. The authority was directed to

take an independent decision in granting such scale of

pay.

       Learned senior advocate representing the State

respondents    relies       upon       a    report   filed   by   the

Commissioner of School Education signed on 29 th

August, 2024 which mentions that the teachers who

possess B.Ed. qualification will have to undergo six

months bridge course.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of

Devesh Sharma (supra) was pleased to hold that B.Ed.

is no longer a recognized training qualification for

teaching students in the primary schools. The

candidates possessing B.Ed. qualification is required to

undergo a bridge course and the said course is

required to be designed by NCTE.

In line with the direction passed by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court it is hereby directed that as and when

such course is designed by NCTE, the District Primary

School Council shall forward the details of the

petitioners for obtaining the six months bridge course.

Following the direction by the Hon'ble Division

Bench of this Court in the matter of Waliur Rahaman

& Ors. (supra) the Council is directed to consider the

prayer of the petitioners for grant of 'A' category scale

of pay as has been allowed in respect of several other

similarly placed teachers.

A decision with regard to grant of 'A' category

scale of pay shall be taken by the District Inspector of

Schools (Primary Education), North 24 Parganas with

the approval of the competent authority at the earliest

but positively within a period of eight weeks from the

date of communication of this order.

In the event the District Inspector of Schools

(Primary Education), North 24 Parganas is of the

opinion that the petitioners would be entitled to 'A'

category scale of pay, then consequential steps shall be

taken by the said authority immediately thereafter.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be

supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as

possible.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter