Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2910 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2024
OCD-28 & 29
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
(Commercial Division)
EC/52/2024
AB ENTERPRISES
VS
UNION OF INDIA
with
AP-COM/522/2024
UNION OF INDIA
VS
AB ENTERPRISES
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Date : 11th September, 2024
Appearance:
Ms. Noelle Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Dipanjan Dey, Adv.
Ms. Suchaita Mitra, Adv.
...for the petitioner in EC/52/2024
and for the respondent in AP-Com/522/2024
Mr. Mohit Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Proloy Bhattacharjee, Adv.
Mrs. Sarda Sha, Adv.
...for the judgment-debtor in EC/52/2024 and for the petitioner in AP-Com/522/2024
The Court:- Affidavit-in-opposition and reply filed today be kept on record.
In view of the explanation for the delay beyond three months as stipulated in
Section 34(3), given in paragraph 20 of the present application, being sufficient,
such delay is condoned and the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996 is taken on record.
Heard in part. For further hearing, tomorrow.
(SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
S.Bag/B.pal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!