Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2907 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2024
od-13
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SPECIAL JURISDICTION (CUSTOMS)
ORIGINAL SIDE
IA NO. GA/3/2024
In CUSTA/35/2019
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE)
Vs
M/S. KUNJ BIHARI LAL RADHESHYAM METALS PRIVATE LIMITED
BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM
-A N D-
HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
DATE : September 11, 2024.
Appearance :
Mr. Kaushik Dey, Adv.
Mr. Kaustav Maiti, Adv.
...for appellant.
The Court :- Heard Mr. Dey, learned standing Counsel for the appellant.
None appears for respondent.
This application has been filed to restore the appeal and to be heard and
decided on merits. We have gone through the averments set out in the affidavit
filed in support of the application and we find that as against the common
order passed by the learned Tribunal in the other case the matter has been
remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. Therefore, in order to
maintain consistency the same order is required to be followed. Therefore, the
explanation offered by the department is accepted and the application is
allowed and the appeal is restored to file of this court.
Accordingly, GA/3/2024 is disposed of.
We have restored the appeal, consequently the application filed under
Section 5 is also restored and the delay in filing the appeal of 76 days is
condoned.
This appeal filed by the Customs Department under Section 130 of the
Customs Act, 1962 (the Act) is directed against the common order dated 8 th
March, 2019 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Calcutta in Eastern Zonal. Bench, Calcutta in Appeal No.
C/79138/2018.
The revenue has suggested the following substantial questions of law:
i) Whether the Learned Tribunal has committed gross error by not
appreciating the contents of paragraph 2 of the instruction dated
17.12.2015?
ii) Whether in terms of the instruction dated 17.12.2015 the present
case falls under the monetary limit or the Learned Tribunal ought
to have heard the matter on merits?
iii) Whether the observation of the Commissioner of Customs
(Appeals) and the Learned Tribunal is contrary to the law and
liable to be set aside ?
As mentioned above, the present appeal has been filed by the department
as against the common order passed by the Tribunal in two appeals filed by the
department in appeal nos. C/79148/2018 and cross objection no.
CO/75257/19. The order passed in C/79148/2018 was challenged by the
department before this Court in CUSTA/37/2019 and the Hon'ble Division
Bench by judgment dated 17th December 2020 set aside the order passed by
the learned Tribunal dated 8th March, 2019 and remanded the appeal to the
Tribunal for disposal on merits. Since the impugned order has already been set
aside in connected matter, different approach cannot be made in the present
appeal.
Therefore, following the order passed in CUSTA/37/2019 the appeal is
allowed and the order impugned is set aside and the order impugned is set
aside and the matter is remanded to the learned Tribunal on the same line as
in CUSTA/37/2019.
Consequently, GA/1/2024 and GA/2/2024 are disposed of treating the
same as on day's list.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
pkd/GH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!