Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manju Maiti & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 5219 Cal

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5219 Cal
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2024

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Manju Maiti & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 8 October, 2024

Author: Amrita Sinha

Bench: Amrita Sinha

                         In the High Court At Calcutta
                        Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                                 Appellate Side
   SL-07
08.10.2024
  AGM

                               WPA 20599 of 2024

                              Manju Maiti & Ors.
                                      vs.
                        The State of West Bengal & Ors.

                  Mr. Bidhan Biswas.
                  Mr. Tapas Chatterjee.
                                   ... For the Petitioners.
                  Md. Sarwar Jahan.
                  Ms. Mousumi Mitra.
                  Ms. Tapati Sarkar.
                                   ... For the respondent no. 4.

Ms. Asmita Chakraborty.

... For the State.

1. Affidavit-of-service filed today be kept with the records.

2. The petitioners were initially serving as Sahayak/Sahayika in Shishu Shiksha Kendra. They exercised option to avail the benefit given in favour of para teachers.

3. The benefit of para teacher to be given to the Sahayak/Sahayika was, on publication of the notification, found to be not beneficial. The petitioners, accordingly, intends to be reverted back to the status of Sahayak/Sahayika and they intend to remain in service till 65 years of age.

4. Various writ petitions on similar facts were considered by the Court and the Court by judgment dated 27th September, 2024 in WPA 24808 of 2024 (Antara Pandit & Ors -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.) directed the concerned State authorities including PBRSSM authorities to treat the petitioners as Sahayak/Sahayika and the option submitted by them to be treated as para teacher has been directed to be treated as cancelled.

5. As the facts of the case are similar to the case of Antara Pandit & Ors (supra), accordingly, in line with the above judgment the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the Mission Director to treat the petitioners as Sahayak/Sahayika and permit them to remain in service till 65 years of age.

6. No benefit in respect of para teacher will be allowed in their favour.

7. The order passed hereinabove will not be applicable in respect of the following petitioners and the writ petition shall be deemed to be dismissed in respect of them:

     SL Nos.                          Name

     13.                        Renuka Samanta Parui.

     15.                        Champa Mondal.

     30.                        Tapasi Pal.

     31.                        Sovana Hazra.

     32.                        Sankari Acharyya.

     113.                       Sita Sing.

     121.                       Chandana Mallik.





8. The writ petition stands disposed of.

9. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter