Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6312 Cal
Judgement Date : 20 September, 2023
20.09.2023
Item No.21
Court No.6.
AB
M.A.T. 251 of 2023
With
CAN 1 of 2023
Ramakant Upadhyay
Vs
The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Others
Mr. S. Das,
Ms. Ananya Chakraborty...for the appellant.
Mr. Arindam Banerjee,
Mr. Sunny Nandy,
Mr. Francis Samson Correa,
Ms. Sneha Singh ...for the respondent no.10.
Mr. Gopal Chandra Das, Mr. Rudranil De ...for the KMC.
This appeal is directed against a judgment and
order dated January 11, 2023, whereby the writ
petition of the appellant was disposed of by a learned
Single Judge of this Court.
The appellant had approached the learned
Single Judge with the grievance that the private
respondent in the writ petition has made unauthorized
construction and/or construction in deviation from the
sanctioned plan. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation
filed a report before the learned Single Judge
wherefrom it appeared that the deviation that was
detected has been regularized upon deposit of
retention charges amounting to approximately
Rs.14.09 Lacs. Accordingly, the learned Judge
disposed of the writ petition without passing any
order.
Being aggrieved, the writ petitioner is before us
by way of this appeal.
Although we have heard learned Counsel for the
appellant on the point of locus standi of the appellant
to maintain the writ petition, since the impugned
construction is in Salt Lake and the appellant is a
resident of Howrah, we need not go into that question
or express any opinion on that in the present case.
We are told by learned Advocate for the
appellant that a representation dated June 25, 2022
has been made by the appellant to various Officers of
the Corporation including the Executive Engineer,
Borough-III Committee, Kolkata Municipal
Corporation, being the respondent no.6 herein. We
direct the Executive Engineer to dispose of such
representation by a reasoned order, in accordance
with law and the applicable Rules and Regulations,
within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of
a copy of this order along with a copy of the
representation, after affording opportunity of hearing
to all concerned parties, including the present
appellant and the private respondent. The order to be
passed by the respondent no.6 shall be communicated
to the parties within a week from the date of the order.
MAT 251 of 2023 is disposed of along with CAN
1 of 2023.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be supplied expeditiously after compliance
with all the necessary formalities.
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!