Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2520 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2023
IA No. GA 2 of 2022
APOT No. 178 of 2023
with
TS No. 10 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
In appeal from its
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
In the matter of:
Jatindra Nath Biswas (Dec)
And
Sirupa Biswas
Versus
Supratik Biswas
Before:
The Hon'ble Justice I. P. MUKERJI
And
The Hon'ble Justice BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Date: 5th September 2023
Appearance:
Mr. Rahul Karmakar, Advocate
Mr. Asif Sohail Tarafdar, Advocate
Mr. Sounak Mukherjee, Advocate
for the appellant
Mr. Ayan Boral, Advocate
Mr. I. B. Jha, Advocate
Mr. A. KI. Ghosh, Advocate
for the respondent
The Court: We admit the appeal.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties we are in a position
to dispose of the appeal dispensing with all formalities.
Jatindra Nath Biswas executed his alleged last will and
testament on 23rd March 2014. He died on 21st May 2019. The appellant,
Sirupa Biswas, is his widow and propounder of this alleged will as
executrix. By this alleged will the testator had bequeathed his entire
properties to the propounder and his younger son, Pradipto Biswas
residing in the United Kingdom.
The elder son, Supratik Biswas, who was excluded from
succession challenged this alleged will by filing a caveat and thereafter
an affidavit in support thereof. The proceeding is now numbered as a
contentious cause after filing of the affidavit in support of the caveat.
At this stage, the appellant made an application for the
amendment of the application for probate. Several paragraphs were
sought to be added by way of proposed amendments.
The testator's illness of cancer and that he was in a fit mental
state at the time of execution of the will and that the elder son/caveator
did not look after his father were sought to be stated. The United
Kingdom had granted him tourist visa to visit his younger son was a
proof of the fact, it was stated.
On the objection raised by the respondent the learned single
judge in his impugned judgment and order dated 25th April 2023 found
the proposed amendment to be untenable and dismissed the application.
Hence this appeal.
On examination of the proposed amendments we find that they
may be irrelevant. The propounder is required to present the last will and
testament before the court for its evaluation that it was properly
executed, attested with full mental capacity and is otherwise genuine.
What is stated in the proposed amendment is fact with evidence, as a
kind of response to the affidavit in support of the caveat. In our opinion,
they are superfluous and should have no repercussion on the
proceedings.
We make it clear that each and every fact sought to be urged by
the proposed amendment has to be proved before the appropriate court.
In those circumstances, we modify the impugned judgment and
order dated 25th April 2023 by allowing the above amendments, subject
to our observation.
The department is directed to carry out the amendments as
prayed for within two weeks of communication of this order.
Let a copy of the amended plaint be served by the advocate-on-
record for the appellant/plaintiff on his counterpart for the
respondent/defendant within 15th September 2023.
Liberty is given to the caveator to file an additional written
statement by 29th September 2023.
The appeal (APOT 178 of 2023) and the connected stay
application (IA No. GA 2 of 2023) are disposed of.
(I. P. MUKERJI, J.)
(BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY, J.)
R. Bose
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!