Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7346 Cal
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2023
19.10.2023
ct. 236
sk,sl. 8
S.A.135 of 2019
Prakash Chand Vaidya & Ors.-vs-Shakil Ahmed
.
Mr. Bhaskar Ghosh, Ld. Sr. Adv. Mr. Rwitendra Banerjee Mr. Siddhartha Paul Mr. Janardhan Mondal ...for the appellants.
Mr. Dipta Dipak Banerjee Mr. Joydeep Chatterjee Mr. Diwakar Pathak Ms. Nilakshmi Ghosh ........for the respondent.
1. Shakil Ahmed was the original appellant
before the court at whose instance second
appeal being SA 135 of 2019 was admitted.
During pendency of the appeal Shaheen Khan
filed an application under Order 22 Rule 10,
having acquired interest in the suit property by
purchase.
2. Accordingly, Shaheen Khan was substituted
in place of Shakil Ahmed but in the cause title
of judgment the name of Shakil Ahmed was
typed inadvertently as respondent in place and
stead of Saheen Khan.
3. Another typographical mistake has crept in
the second line of the first paragraph of the
judgment where Title Appeal No. 129 of 2017
has been written as 1296 of 2017.
4. This typographical mistakes be therefore
removed. The cause title of the judgment be
corrected. Server copy be also corrected
accordingly.
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!